Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Sampath, Krishna

  • Google
  • 3
  • 2
  • 14

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2023Application of Machine Learning to Regression Analysis of a Large SMA Weld Metal Database4citations
  • 2022Metallurgical Design Rules for High-Strength Steel Weld Metals4citations
  • 2021Analysis of a High-Strength Steel SMAW Database6citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Varadarajan, Rajan
1 / 1 shared
Society, American Welding
3 / 10 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2022
2021

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Varadarajan, Rajan
  • Society, American Welding
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Metallurgical Design Rules for High-Strength Steel Weld Metals

  • Sampath, Krishna
  • Society, American Welding
Abstract

<jats:p>A review of a dilatometric analysis of selected Fe-C-Mn high-strength steel shielded metal arc weld metals showed that balanced Ti, B, Al, O, and N additions reduced the austenite-to-ferrite transformation-start (TS) temperature. These microalloy additions must match the following aim levels for composition control: Ti at 400 ppm (0.04 wt-%), B at 40 ppm (0.004 wt-%), Al at 200 ppm (0.020 wt-%), O at 400 ppm (0.04 wt-%), and N preferably below 80 ppm (0.008 wt-%) to ensure effective deoxidation, form complex inclusions, and distribute them to enable development of highly fracture-resistant refined weld metal microstructures. It may be wiser to avoid the rich and lean ends for these microalloy additions, except N, which should be held at the lean end, preferably much below 80 ppm (0.008 wt-%). The balanced Ti, B, Al, O, and N additions offered nearly a 100°C shift in lowering the Charpy V-notch (CVN) test temperature for either 28 or 100 J absorbed energy. Dilatometric evaluations of reheated weld metals showed that 1) the balanced Ti, B, Al, O, and N additions lowered the actual TS temperature by about 60°C compared to the calculated austenite-to-ferrite transformation temperature obtained from the constitutional equation; 2) N with more than 100 ppm (0.010 wt-%) effectively nullified the beneficial effects of Ti, B, and Al additions in lowering the transformation temperature; and 3) at N content much below 80 ppm (0.008 wt-%), both a lower TS temperature and a narrow start-to-finish (TS–Tf) temperature range helped in achieving exceptional weld metal CVN impact toughness.</jats:p>

Topics
  • microstructure
  • inclusion
  • strength
  • steel