Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Kopp, Philipp

  • Google
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2023Laser beam shape optimization: Exploring alternative profiles to Gaussian-shaped laser beams in powder bed fusion of metalscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Meier, Christoph
1 / 11 shared
Grundewald, Jonas
1 / 1 shared
Holla, Vijaya
1 / 1 shared
Praegla, Patrick M.
1 / 3 shared
Wudy, Katrin
1 / 10 shared
Kollmannsberger, Stefan
1 / 6 shared
Chart of publication period
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Meier, Christoph
  • Grundewald, Jonas
  • Holla, Vijaya
  • Praegla, Patrick M.
  • Wudy, Katrin
  • Kollmannsberger, Stefan
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Laser beam shape optimization: Exploring alternative profiles to Gaussian-shaped laser beams in powder bed fusion of metals

  • Meier, Christoph
  • Grundewald, Jonas
  • Kopp, Philipp
  • Holla, Vijaya
  • Praegla, Patrick M.
  • Wudy, Katrin
  • Kollmannsberger, Stefan
Abstract

Laser-based powder bed fusion of metals (PBF-LB/M) commonly utilizes Gaussian-shaped laser beams characterized by a high intensity at the center. However, this type of profile leads to localized high temperatures and temperature gradients. When the laser power is increased beyond a certain threshold, the temperature inside the melt pool can reach the boiling point, causing excessive metal evaporation, hydrodynamic instabilities, and undesired effects such as keyholing. On the other hand, ring-shaped laser beams generate a more uniform temperature distribution but tend to produce shallower, wider, and shorter melt pools with reduced resolution compared to the Gaussian profiles. The deep, narrow, and elongated melt pools generated by the Gaussian shapes still have advantages for increased precision in the PBF-LB/M processes. This contribution uses numerical optimization to generate a new laser beam shape that also leads to a deep, narrow, and elongated melt pool, similar to a Gaussian-shaped beam, while maintaining a lower and more uniform temperature distribution inside the melt pool. The resulting optimized laser profile lowers the maximum laser intensity by 40 % without decreasing the total laser power compared to the Gaussian profile. The more uniform distribution of temperature with a peak value of just above 3 000 ◦C indicates a conduction dominated process with less hydrodynamic and minimal evaporative effects. This is expected to reduce the associated defects and improve the process stability

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • melt
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • selective laser melting
  • defect
  • evaporation