Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Moritzer, E.

  • Google
  • 4
  • 6
  • 3

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (4/4 displayed)

  • 2022Validation and Comparison of Fem-Simulation Results of the Fused Deposition Modeling Process under Consideration of Different Mesh Resolutionscitations
  • 2022Investigation of the Process Parameters and Geometry Dependent Shrinkage Behavior of Raster Lines in the Fused Deposition Modeling Processcitations
  • 2021Comparison of Component Properties and Economic Efficiency of the Arburg Plastic Freeforming and Fused Deposition Modelingcitations
  • 2019Plastic droplet welding: bond strength between plastic freeforming structures and continuous fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites3citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Hecker, Felix
3 / 3 shared
Hirsch, A.
2 / 21 shared
Driediger, C.
1 / 1 shared
Heim, Hans-Peter
1 / 104 shared
Cherif, C.
1 / 15 shared
Truemper, W.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2021
2019

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Hecker, Felix
  • Hirsch, A.
  • Driediger, C.
  • Heim, Hans-Peter
  • Cherif, C.
  • Truemper, W.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Validation and Comparison of Fem-Simulation Results of the Fused Deposition Modeling Process under Consideration of Different Mesh Resolutions

  • Hecker, Felix
  • Moritzer, E.
Abstract

The Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) process is an Additive Manufacturing (AM) technology. In the FDM process, components are generated by feeding a thermoplastic polymer filament into a heated nozzle and depositing the molten material layer-by-layer in a defined way onto the building platform or an already existing component structure. The strand-by- strand deposition leads to a complex cooling situation which contributes to the non-uniform shrinkage of components in the FDM-process. Using an AM plug-in for the FEM-simulation software Abaqus, the thermal and mechanical aspects of a component can be simulated according to the temporal sequence of the manufacturing process. For this, the birth-death- method is used in the simulations. During the investigations, the simulation results regarding geometrical deviations are compared to the actual deviation of the manufactured specimens. Furthermore, the influences of the mesh resolution on the simulation results and the required time for the simulations are considered.

Topics
  • Deposition
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • simulation
  • thermoplastic
  • additive manufacturing