Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Córcoles, Xavier Carrillo

  • Google
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2024Aeroelastic Tailoring of a Strut-Braced Wing for a Medium Range Aircraft1citations
  • 2023Optimization Framework of a Ram Air Inlet Composite Morphing Flap1citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Sodja, Jurij
2 / 8 shared
Breuker, Roeland De
2 / 22 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Sodja, Jurij
  • Breuker, Roeland De
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Aeroelastic Tailoring of a Strut-Braced Wing for a Medium Range Aircraft

  • Sodja, Jurij
  • Córcoles, Xavier Carrillo
  • Breuker, Roeland De
Abstract

This study explores the implementation of aeroelastic tailoring in the design of a regional aircraft featuring a strut-braced wing (SBW). Making use of the aeroelastic optimisation framework from Delft University of Technology, PROTEUS, the research addresses two distinct cases. The first case involves a simplified SBW geometry to validate the modifications of PROTEUS, which were conducted to include the strut in the aeroelastic analysis. Static and dynamic load cases are compared with a NX Nastran aeroelastic model, showing good agreement in displacements, strains, and gust response. In the second case, the study investigates the weight-saving potential of aeroelastic tailoring in an SBW aircraft based on the ATR-72. Three optimisation scenarios, allowing various laminate types, are examined: unbalanced symmetric laminates, balanced symmetric laminates, and a thickness optimisation with a prescribed balanced symmetric stacking sequence. The results reveal that the prescribed stacking sequence limits stiffness tailoring, thereby also reducing potential weight savings. Moreover, the study shows how the presence of a strut reduces wing deflections, limiting the effectiveness of aeroelastic tailoring.

Topics