Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Hatfka, Rt

  • Google
  • 1
  • 4
  • 48

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2008Lay-Up Optimization of Composite Stiffened Panels using Linear Approximations in Lamination Space48citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Weaver, Pm
1 / 560 shared
Friswell, Mi
1 / 29 shared
Haftka, Rt
1 / 2 shared
Herencia, Je
1 / 21 shared
Chart of publication period
2008

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Weaver, Pm
  • Friswell, Mi
  • Haftka, Rt
  • Herencia, Je
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Lay-Up Optimization of Composite Stiffened Panels using Linear Approximations in Lamination Space

  • Weaver, Pm
  • Friswell, Mi
  • Hatfka, Rt
  • Haftka, Rt
  • Herencia, Je
Abstract

A new two-step approach to optimize anisotropic composite stiffened panels is presented. At the first step, a representative element of the stiffened panel (superstiffener) is optimized using continuous optimization of lamination parameters under strength, buckling and practical design constraints. At the second step, a genetic algorithm is used to identify the actual superstiffener’s laminates. The fitness function in the genetic algorithm is formed by using a first order (linear) Taylor series of the design constraints, instead of the traditional squared differences between the optimum and actual lamination parameters (minimum squared distance). Results show that for the same thicknesses of the superstiffener’s laminates, the new designs had lower violation of the critical constraint than those obtained from minimum squared distanced. Consequently, laminates’ thicknesses could be reduced and thus mass savings are achieved. In addition, it is found that fitness based on constraint satisfaction drives the genetic algorithm in a different direction than the minimum distance criterion and produces designs that may not be close to the continuous design in the lamination parameter design space. Overall, this suggests that the minimum squared distance may not be the best objective to identify the optimal laminates’ stacking sequences.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • strength
  • anisotropic
  • composite