Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Sun, Wen

  • Google
  • 2
  • 9
  • 1

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2023Effects of Shot Peening Pressure on Friction and Wear of High Pressure Cold Sprayed Ti-6Al-4V Coatings Under Dry and Lubrication Conditions1citations
  • 2018Additive manufacturing of inconel 625 superalloy parts via high pressure cold spraycitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Liu, Erjia
2 / 5 shared
Butler, David
1 / 14 shared
Khun, Nay Win
1 / 7 shared
Trung, Pham Quang
1 / 9 shared
Yeetan, Adrian Wei
1 / 1 shared
Bhowmik, Ayan
1 / 9 shared
Huong, Yan
1 / 1 shared
Marinescu, Iulian
1 / 1 shared
Tan, Adrian Wei-Yee
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2018

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Liu, Erjia
  • Butler, David
  • Khun, Nay Win
  • Trung, Pham Quang
  • Yeetan, Adrian Wei
  • Bhowmik, Ayan
  • Huong, Yan
  • Marinescu, Iulian
  • Tan, Adrian Wei-Yee
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Effects of Shot Peening Pressure on Friction and Wear of High Pressure Cold Sprayed Ti-6Al-4V Coatings Under Dry and Lubrication Conditions

  • Liu, Erjia
  • Butler, David
  • Khun, Nay Win
  • Trung, Pham Quang
  • Yeetan, Adrian Wei
  • Sun, Wen
Abstract

<p>The effects of shot peening pressure (SPP) (10-60psi) on the wear resistance of high-pressure-cold-sprayed Ti-6Al-4V coatings (HPCSTi64-Coats) were investigated against 100Cr6 steel with or without mineral oil lubricant (MOL), which have not been reported yet. The specific wear rate (SWR) of the HPCSTi64-Coat with the SPP of 60psi was 29% lower than that of the one without shot peening (SP). With the MOL, the SWR of the HPCSTi64-Coat without SP was 40.8% higher than that of the one with 10psi. The SWR of the HPCSTi64-Coat became higher with higher SPP while the SWR of the HPCSTi64-Coat with 60psi was 76.5% higher than that of the one with 10psi. Therefore, the best SPP for the best bearing surface of the HPCSTi64-Coat with the MOL was 10psi. In spite of that, the HPCSTi64-Coats lubricated with the MOL had smaller SWRs for all the SPPs so that the SWRs of the HPCSTi64-Coats with the SPPs of 0 and 60psi were 2.4 and 0.9 times higher, respectively, in the tribo-tests without than with the MOL.</p>

Topics
  • mineral
  • surface
  • wear resistance
  • steel