Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Lu, Liming

  • Google
  • 8
  • 30
  • 161

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (8/8 displayed)

  • 2021Characterisation of SFCA phases in iron ore sinter by combined optical microscopy and electron probe microanalysis (EPMA)citations
  • 2021Positive Influence of WHIMS Concentrate on the Sintering Performance of Roy Hill Finescitations
  • 2018Importance of textural information in mathematical modelling of iron ore fines sintering performance8citations
  • 2015Automated optical image analysis of natural and sintered iron ore22citations
  • 2015Utilization of biomass as an alternative fuel in ironmaking44citations
  • 2014Effect of sintering conditions on the formation of mineral phases during iron ore sintering with New Zealand ironsandcitations
  • 2014Current status and future direction of low-emission Integrated Steelmaking Process3citations
  • 2013Substitution of charcoal for coke breeze in iron ore sintering84citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Pownceby, Mark
2 / 14 shared
Han, Hongliang
1 / 2 shared
Donskoi, Eugene
3 / 12 shared
Ware, Natalie
1 / 4 shared
Cao, Xueming
1 / 2 shared
Mcdonald, Brian
1 / 2 shared
Manuel, James
3 / 13 shared
Holmes, Ralph
1 / 1 shared
Raynlyn, Tirsha
1 / 1 shared
Jahanshahi, Sharif
3 / 6 shared
Deev, Alex
2 / 4 shared
Mathieson, John
3 / 6 shared
Pinson, David
1 / 2 shared
Rogers, Harold
2 / 4 shared
Chew, Sheng
1 / 3 shared
Wang, Zhe
1 / 5 shared
Monaghan, Brian
1 / 1 shared
Zhang, Guangqing
1 / 2 shared
Zulli, Paul
2 / 7 shared
Brooks, G. A.
1 / 4 shared
Jones, R. T.
1 / 1 shared
Xie, Dongsheng
1 / 2 shared
Grimsey, E. J.
1 / 1 shared
Haque, Nawshad
1 / 9 shared
Mackey, P. J.
1 / 1 shared
Norgate, Terry
1 / 2 shared
Pan, Yuhua
1 / 2 shared
Ridgeway, Phillip
1 / 2 shared
Adam, Matt
1 / 3 shared
Kilburn, Matt
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2021
2018
2015
2014
2013

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Pownceby, Mark
  • Han, Hongliang
  • Donskoi, Eugene
  • Ware, Natalie
  • Cao, Xueming
  • Mcdonald, Brian
  • Manuel, James
  • Holmes, Ralph
  • Raynlyn, Tirsha
  • Jahanshahi, Sharif
  • Deev, Alex
  • Mathieson, John
  • Pinson, David
  • Rogers, Harold
  • Chew, Sheng
  • Wang, Zhe
  • Monaghan, Brian
  • Zhang, Guangqing
  • Zulli, Paul
  • Brooks, G. A.
  • Jones, R. T.
  • Xie, Dongsheng
  • Grimsey, E. J.
  • Haque, Nawshad
  • Mackey, P. J.
  • Norgate, Terry
  • Pan, Yuhua
  • Ridgeway, Phillip
  • Adam, Matt
  • Kilburn, Matt
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Substitution of charcoal for coke breeze in iron ore sintering

  • Adam, Matt
  • Jahanshahi, Sharif
  • Kilburn, Matt
  • Mathieson, John
  • Lu, Liming
Abstract

The substitution of charcoal as an alternative fuel to coke breeze in a simulated Japanese Steel Mills (JSM) sinter blend was investigated. Compared with coke breeze, higher mix moisture contents were required for the sinter mixture containing charcoal to achieve optimum granulation. The green granules formed from the sinter mixture containing charcoal were clearly less dense and formed a less compacted green bed as evidenced by the packing density. To achieve return fines balance, fuel addition had to be increased from 3.62 to 4.17% (on a dry mixture basis) as the substitution of charcoal increased from 0 to 50%. However, at 100% subsitution, the sinter mixture failed to achieve balance even at a very high fuel addition level of 4.7%. Compared with the sinter fired with coke breeze, the sinter from the mixtures containing up to 50% charcoal was marginally weaker in terms of sinter yield, tumble strength (TI) and reduction disintegration (RDI). The reasons for weaker sinter are discussed. Fuel rate increased considerably with charcoal substitution due to increased fuel addition and decreased sinter yield. However, increasing fuel rate did not lead to a reduction of sintering productivity. In contrast, the sintering speed and productivity were maintained as the charcoal substitution rate increased from 0 to 25% and then increased considerably with further increase in charcoal substitution rate. The emission mechanisms of the CO, CO2, SO2 and NOX and H2O gases during sintering are clearly quite different. CO, CO2 and NOx emission was observed over the entire sintering process and varied slightly as the sintering process progressed. However, the SO2 and H2O emissions were observed only towards the completion of the sintering process. Both the CO and CO2 concentrations in the waste gas increased with the increasing substitution of charcoal for coke breeze; however the concentrations of SO2 and NOX in the waste gas decreased.

Topics
  • density
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • strength
  • steel
  • iron
  • sintering