Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Heino, Jyrki

  • Google
  • 1
  • 6
  • 10

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2012Influence of fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag on the mechanical properties and reduction behavior of cold-agglomerated blast furnace briquettes10citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Makkonen, Hannu
1 / 1 shared
Paananen, Timo
1 / 1 shared
Dahl, Olli
1 / 4 shared
Kokkonen, Tommi
1 / 1 shared
Huttunen, Satu
1 / 1 shared
Mäkelä, Mikko
1 / 9 shared
Chart of publication period
2012

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Makkonen, Hannu
  • Paananen, Timo
  • Dahl, Olli
  • Kokkonen, Tommi
  • Huttunen, Satu
  • Mäkelä, Mikko
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Influence of fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag on the mechanical properties and reduction behavior of cold-agglomerated blast furnace briquettes

  • Makkonen, Hannu
  • Paananen, Timo
  • Heino, Jyrki
  • Dahl, Olli
  • Kokkonen, Tommi
  • Huttunen, Satu
  • Mäkelä, Mikko
Abstract

<p>The utilization of fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) as supplementary cementing materials in cold-agglomerated blast furnace briquetting was investigated. Sample analysis included chemical and mineralogical composition, particle size, and scanning electron microscopy and the produced briquettes were evaluated for mechanical durability (2, 7, and 28 day tumble strength), mineralogy, thermal decomposition (DSC-TG-MS), and disintegration under reducing conditions at 800°C (LTD). Based on the data, only the use of GGBFS with or without fly ash led to satisfactory 28 day mechanical durability compared to the 28 day reference mean value. The most promising series, where 20% of Portland cement was replaced by a three-fold amount of GGBFS, attested to a 30% strength increase at 28 day compared to the respective reference mean value. However, the 48 hour durability values proved inferior to respective references due to the comparatively larger particle size (one fly ash sample) and slower strength development provided by the supplements. The LTD (800°C) values determined by isothermal reduction at 800°C were strongly correlated (R <sup>2</sup> = 0.694) with briquette mechanical durability governed by the dehydration of the C-S-H phase at approximately 320-360°C established by DSC-TG-MS. Subsequent to the dehydration of C-S-H, briquette durability was possibly maintained by the formation of an intermediate carbonated phase prior to final breakdown under the conditions of the LTD (800°C) test. Briquette moisture optimization was encouraged by the variation in detected levels, prospectively emphasized by the ability of industrial-scale briquetting plants to operate on comparatively lower moisture levels.</p>

Topics
  • phase
  • scanning electron microscopy
  • strength
  • cement
  • mass spectrometry
  • thermogravimetry
  • differential scanning calorimetry
  • durability
  • thermal decomposition