People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Bunaziv, Ivan
SINTEF
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (20/20 displayed)
- 2024CFD modeling for predicting imperfections in laser welding and additive manufacturing of aluminum alloys
- 2023Numerical modelling of high-power laser spot melting of thin stainless steel
- 2023Laser beam remelting of stainless steel plate for cladding and comparison with conventional CMT processcitations
- 2023A comparative study of laser-arc hybrid welding with arc welding for fabrication of offshore substructurescitations
- 2022Effect of preheating and preplaced filler wire on microstructure and toughness in laser-arc hybrid welding of thick steelcitations
- 2021Root formation and metallurgical challenges in laser beam and laser-arc hybrid welding of thick structural steelcitations
- 2021Root formation and metallurgical challenges in laser beam and laser-arc hybrid welding of thick structural steelcitations
- 2021A Review on Laser-Assisted Joining of Aluminium Alloys to Other Metalscitations
- 2021Laser Beam and Laser-Arc Hybrid Welding of Aluminium Alloyscitations
- 2021Laser Beam and Laser-Arc Hybrid Welding of Aluminium Alloyscitations
- 2020Laser-arc hybrid welding of 12- and 15-mm thick structural steelcitations
- 2020Filler metal distribution and processing stability in laser-arc hybrid welding of thick HSLA steelcitations
- 2020Additive Manufacturing with Superduplex Stainless Steel Wire by CMT Processcitations
- 2020Additive Manufacturing with Superduplex Stainless Steel Wire by CMT Processcitations
- 2019Metallurgical Aspects in the Welding of Clad Pipelines—A Global Outlookcitations
- 2019Metallurgical Aspects in the Welding of Clad Pipelines—A Global Outlookcitations
- 2019Porosity and solidification cracking in welded 45 mm thick steel by fiber laser-MAG processcitations
- 2019Dry hyperbaric welding of HSLA steel up to 35 bar ambient pressure with CMT arc modecitations
- 2019Application of laser-arc hybrid welding of steel for low-temperature servicecitations
- 2017Hybrid Welding of 45 mm High Strength Steel Sectionscitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
CFD modeling for predicting imperfections in laser welding and additive manufacturing of aluminum alloys
Abstract
<jats:p>Aluminum and its alloys are widely used in various applications including e-mobility applications due to their lightweight nature, high corrosion resistance, good electrical conductivity, and excellent processability such as extrusion and forming. However, aluminum and its alloys are difficult to process with a laser beam due to their high thermal conductivity and reflectivity. In this article, the two most used laser processes, i.e., laser welding and laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing, for processing of aluminum have been studied. There are many common laser-material interaction mechanisms and challenges between the two processes. Deep keyhole mode is a preferred method for welding due to improved productivity, while a heat conduction mode is preferred in LPBF aiming for zero-defect parts. In LPBF, the processing maps are highly desirable to be constructed, which shows the transition zone. Presented numerical modeling provides a more in-depth understanding of porosity formation, and different laser beam movement paths have been tested including circular oscillation paths. High accuracy processing maps can be constructed for LPBF that allows us to minimize tedious and time-consuming experiments. As a result, a modeling framework is a highly viable option for the cost-efficient optimization of process parameters.</jats:p>