Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Nasrollahi, Vahid

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 7

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2023Investigation of precession laser machining of microholes in aerospace material7citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Penchev, Pavel
1 / 12 shared
Dimov, Stefan
1 / 31 shared
Le, Hoang
1 / 2 shared
Marimuthu, Sundar
1 / 2 shared
Crozier, Mickey
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Penchev, Pavel
  • Dimov, Stefan
  • Le, Hoang
  • Marimuthu, Sundar
  • Crozier, Mickey
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Investigation of precession laser machining of microholes in aerospace material

  • Nasrollahi, Vahid
  • Penchev, Pavel
  • Dimov, Stefan
  • Le, Hoang
  • Marimuthu, Sundar
  • Crozier, Mickey
Abstract

<jats:p>Sidewall tapering is one of the main limitations in ultrashort pulse (USP) laser machining and is associated with the beam shape and self-limiting effect. Laser processing with a precession beam is a potential solution to overcome this limitation. A study into the effects of precession parameters on the taper angle in microhole drilling of a nickel alloy is reported in this paper. The effects of three key precession parameters, i.e., incident angle, relative distance between the focuses of the precession and individual beams, and scanning speed, have been investigated in detail. Experiments were performed to drill through holes with aspect ratios up to 20:1 and diameters ranging from 100 to 500 μm over 0.6–2 mm thick nickel alloy substrates. Experiment results showed that all the considered parameters/factors were significant and affected the hole tapering in different ways. In addition, there were important interaction effects between two of the factors, i.e., incident angle and focus position, in some cases. The optimal parameters to minimize the tapering effect are suggested, and the mechanism is discussed in detail. The precession laser machining showed clear advantages in overcoming the limitations to associated with conventional USP laser machining. Fabricating microholes with high geometrical accuracy, i.e., with straight side walls and zero taper angles, is feasible with the use of a precession beam. The results clearly show the potential of precession laser processing and the capabilities that the technology can offer for a range of laser micromachining applications in different industries, such as microelectronics, automotive, and aerospace.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • nickel
  • experiment
  • nickel alloy