Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Jardon, Zoé

  • Google
  • 12
  • 14
  • 60

Vrije Universiteit Brussel

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (12/12 displayed)

  • 2023Experimental evaluation of the metal powder particle flow on the melt pool during directed energy deposition3citations
  • 2023Comparison and Analysis of Hyperspectral Temperature Data in Directed Energy Deposition3citations
  • 2022Numerical and experimental study of a crack localisation system embedded in 3D printed smart metallic componentscitations
  • 2022Powder-Gas Jet Velocity Characterization during Coaxial Directed Energy Deposition Process1citations
  • 2021Prediction of build geometry for DED using supervised learning methods on simulated process monitoring data8citations
  • 2021Structural health monitoring through surface acoustic wave inspection deployed on capillaries embedded in additively manufactured componentscitations
  • 2021Process parameter study for enhancement of directed energy deposition powder efficiency based on single-track geometry evaluation10citations
  • 2021Production Assessment of Hybrid Directed Energy Deposition Manufactured Sample with Integrated Effective Structural Health Monitoring channel (eSHM)4citations
  • 2020Offline powder-gas nozzle jet characterization for coaxial laser-based Directed Energy Deposition21citations
  • 2019On the Influence of Capillary-Based Structural Health Monitoring on Fatigue Crack Initiation and Propagation in Straight Lugs3citations
  • 2018Effective Structural Health Monitoring through the Monitoring of Pressurized Capillaries in Additive Manufactured Materialscitations
  • 2017Proof of Concept of Integrated Load Measurement in 3D Printed Structures7citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Helsen, Jan
2 / 9 shared
Powell, John
1 / 7 shared
Sanchez Medina, Jorge
3 / 6 shared
Hinderdael, Michaël
10 / 22 shared
Baere, Dieter De
5 / 26 shared
Ertveldt, Julien
8 / 16 shared
Guillaume, Patrick
9 / 40 shared
Snyers, Charles
2 / 2 shared
Arroud, Galid
2 / 5 shared
Wyart, Eric
1 / 3 shared
Moonens, Marc
1 / 3 shared
Lison, Margot
1 / 2 shared
Strantza, Maria
1 / 13 shared
Devesse, Wim
1 / 14 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Helsen, Jan
  • Powell, John
  • Sanchez Medina, Jorge
  • Hinderdael, Michaël
  • Baere, Dieter De
  • Ertveldt, Julien
  • Guillaume, Patrick
  • Snyers, Charles
  • Arroud, Galid
  • Wyart, Eric
  • Moonens, Marc
  • Lison, Margot
  • Strantza, Maria
  • Devesse, Wim
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Prediction of build geometry for DED using supervised learning methods on simulated process monitoring data

  • Helsen, Jan
  • Ertveldt, Julien
  • Jardon, Zoé
  • Sanchez Medina, Jorge
  • Snyers, Charles
Abstract

One of today’s ongoing challenges in directed energy deposition (DED) is controlling the geometry and material properties of parts. This manufacturing process is complex and nonlinear due to multiple physical phenomena at play and is therefore hard to model analytically. Machine learning (ML) on the contrary is particularly well suited to predict the behavior of a complex process with multiple inputs and outputs such as DED. A significant amount of data is required to train machine learning models, but experimental data are costly time-wise and should therefore be produced in an intelligent way. As a stepping stone for the future production of experimental training data, a finite element model of the process was developed in this study as an unlimited source of training data for the ML models. This model takes into account the printing parameters (laser speed, laser power, and powder flow rate) and outputs’ simulated process monitoring data thanks to a postprocessing method that is outlined in this article. A dataset was produced by simulating 102 tracks in 316L stainless steel with the model. From the analysis of this dataset, it was shown that K-nearest neighbors, support vector regression, decision tree regression, linear regression, and artificial neural network models are all capable of modelling the relationship between the printing parameters and the melt pool characteristics effectively.

Topics
  • Deposition
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • stainless steel
  • melt
  • directed energy deposition
  • machine learning