Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Quarto, Mariangela

  • Google
  • 16
  • 11
  • 224

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (16/16 displayed)

  • 2024Preliminary assessment of material extrusion (MEX) for medical applications: The effect of hatch anglecitations
  • 2024Geometric Benchmarking of Metal Material Extrusion Technology: A Preliminary Studycitations
  • 2023Novel methodology for burr extension estimation on machined SLM surfacescitations
  • 2022The effect of the heat generated during friction stir welding process on different aluminum alloyscitations
  • 2022Mechanical Characterization of AISI 316L Samples Printed Using Material Extrusion32citations
  • 2021Density and shrinkage evaluation of AISI 316L parts printed via FDM process71citations
  • 2021Processability of metal-filament through polymer FDM machine4citations
  • 2020Study on ZrB2-Based Ceramics Reinforced with SiC Fibers or Whiskers Machined by Micro-Electrical Discharge Machining6citations
  • 2019Machinability and energy efficiency in micro-EDM milling of Zirconium Boride reinforced with silicon carbide fibers20citations
  • 2019Micro-EDM machining of ZrB2-based ceramics reinforced with SiC fibres or whiskerscitations
  • 2019Machinability and Energy Efficiency in Micro-EDM Milling of Zirconium Boride Reinforced with Silicon Carbide Fibers20citations
  • 2018Characterization of surfaces obtained by micro-EDM milling on steel and ceramic components29citations
  • 2018Study on Zirconium Boride Machined by Micro-EDMcitations
  • 2017A model to predict manufacturing cost for micro-EDM drilling17citations
  • 2017Effects of process parameters on surface characteristics in micro-EDM performed on ceramic materialscitations
  • 2015Investigation on power discharge in micro-EDM stainless steel drilling using different electrodes25citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Durso, Gianluca
11 / 25 shared
Nani, Lorenzo
1 / 4 shared
Sala, Francesca
1 / 1 shared
Giardini, Claudio
8 / 58 shared
Locatelli, Gabriele
1 / 1 shared
Durso, Gianluca Danilo
4 / 29 shared
Maccarini, Giancarlo
5 / 17 shared
Bocchi, Sara
1 / 10 shared
Carminati, Mattia
3 / 4 shared
Bissacco, Giuliano
1 / 28 shared
Ravasio, Chiara
3 / 16 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2015

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Durso, Gianluca
  • Nani, Lorenzo
  • Sala, Francesca
  • Giardini, Claudio
  • Locatelli, Gabriele
  • Durso, Gianluca Danilo
  • Maccarini, Giancarlo
  • Bocchi, Sara
  • Carminati, Mattia
  • Bissacco, Giuliano
  • Ravasio, Chiara
OrganizationsLocationPeople

conferencepaper

Preliminary assessment of material extrusion (MEX) for medical applications: The effect of hatch angle

  • Durso, Gianluca
  • Nani, Lorenzo
  • Quarto, Mariangela
  • Sala, Francesca
Abstract

Material extrusion (MEX) is one of the most widely used Additive Manufacturing (AM) technologies owing to its simplicity and accessible cost. The technique is based on the principle of extrusion of thermoplastic material, layer-by-layer, on a building platform through multiple head nozzles. Metal filled filaments, in combination with debinding and sintering cycles, may innovate and transform the traditional functioning of the MEX technique into a cost-effective alternative for the conventional metallic AM processes. In the present document, the optimal printing conditions characterizing LPBF technology were replicated on MEX technology, with the aim of assessing the effects of the printing parameter hatch angle over the material properties and, at the same time, providing a better understanding of the production of medical metal parts via MEX. Indeed, in this particular context, the use of Powder Bed Fusion (PBF) and Directed Energy Deposition (DED) prevails, requiring MEX-based technique extensive research for its applicability. The influence of a specific AM process parameter, the hatch angle, was assessed following a single factor Design of Experiment (DOE), varying over two levels: the optimal Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) scanning strategy (67°k) and the most common MEX deposition strategy (±45°). Specimens were manufactured, using MEX technology (Ultimaker S5) and AISI 316L filament (BASF Ultrafuse 316L) and tested. Results of the defect analysis, including closed and open porosity, and mechanical properties were collected and statistically compared to determine any difference in the two-deposition strategies. Furthermore, in the analysis, LPBF key characteristics are reported as benchmark values.

Topics
  • Deposition
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • experiment
  • extrusion
  • selective laser melting
  • defect
  • porosity
  • thermoplastic
  • directed energy deposition
  • sintering
  • material extrusion