Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Agboola, Ololade

  • Google
  • 1
  • 3
  • 1

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2023Resources and manufacturing technology evaluation of hybrid additive metal laminated tooling for forming1citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Joghan, Hamed Dardaei
1 / 8 shared
Hahn, Marlon
1 / 59 shared
Tekkaya, A. Erman
1 / 34 shared
Chart of publication period
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Joghan, Hamed Dardaei
  • Hahn, Marlon
  • Tekkaya, A. Erman
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Resources and manufacturing technology evaluation of hybrid additive metal laminated tooling for forming

  • Joghan, Hamed Dardaei
  • Hahn, Marlon
  • Tekkaya, A. Erman
  • Agboola, Ololade
Abstract

<jats:p>Abstract. The rough surface finish caused by the stair step effect is the major drawback in the application of sheet metal laminates in rapid tooling. The application of laser metal deposition (LMD) and subsequent post-processing (milling, ball burnishing, and laser polishing) to reduce the stair-step effect in hybrid additive metal laminated forming tools was recently presented. In the present study, the energy consumption and manufacturing time of the hybrid process are compared with the conventional (milling plus hardening by heat treatment) as well as with full LMD and milled components. The hybrid process requires significantly less energy and manufacturing time compared to the LMD components. Since the surface hardness is sufficient for tooling in the hybrid process, no additional hardening is required, also resulting in a shorter manufacturing time and lower energy relative to the conventional method (depending on the part mass, a minimum of 29% is faster). The optimal sheet laminate combination based on the economic criteria for the tool with a radius of 6 mm is presented.</jats:p>

Topics
  • Deposition
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • grinding
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • milling
  • hardness
  • polishing