| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Winter, Sven
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (19/19 displayed)
- 2023Numerical and experimental study of high-speed blanking of DC06 steelcitations
- 2023Influence of surface pressure and tool materials on contact heating of aluminum
- 2022Punching of Ultra-High-Strength Spring Strips: Evolution of Cutting Edge Radius up to 1,000,000 Strokes for Three Punch Materialscitations
- 2022Punching of Ultra-High-Strength Spring Strips: Evolution of Cutting Edge Radius up to 1,000,000 Strokes for Three Punch Materialscitations
- 2022Local Temperature Development in the Fracture Zone during Uniaxial Tensile Testing at High Strain Rate: Experimental and Numerical Investigationscitations
- 2021Effect of sample geometry on the macroscopic shear deformation of the titanium alloy Ti-10V-2Fe-3Al subjected to quasi-static and dynamic compression-shear loadingcitations
- 2021Adiabatic Blanking: Influence of Clearance, Impact Energy, and Velocity on the Blanked Surfacecitations
- 2021Processing Q&P steels by hot-metal gas forming: Influence of local cooling rates on the properties and microstructure of a 3rd generation AHSScitations
- 2021Analyzing the influence of a deep cryogenic treatment on the mechanical properties of blanking tools by using the short-time method PhyBaLCHTcitations
- 2021Experimental and Numerical Investigations into Magnetic Pulse Welding of Aluminum Alloy 6016 to Hardened Steel 22MnB5citations
- 2021Erprobung anwendungsadaptierter CVD-Diamantschichten beim Stanzencitations
- 2020Adiabatic blanking of advanced high-strength steelscitations
- 2020On the evolution of adiabatic shear bands in the beta titanium alloy Ti-10V-2Fe-3Al
- 2020Determination of Material and Failure Characteristics for High-Speed Forming via High-Speed Testing and Inverse Numerical Simulationcitations
- 2020Equal-channel angular pressing influencing the mean stress sensitivity in the high cycle fatigue regime of the 6082 aluminum alloycitations
- 2020Process Development for a Superplastic Hot Tube Gas Forming Process of Titanium (Ti-3Al-2.5V) Hollow Profilescitations
- 2020Process Development for a Superplastic Hot Tube Gas Forming Process of Titanium (Ti-3Al-2.5V) Hollow Profilescitations
- 2019Finite element simulations on the relation of microstructural characteristics and the formation of different types of adiabatic shear bands in a v-titanium alloy ; Finite-Elemente-Simulationen über die Zusammenhänge von mikrostrukturellen Eigenschaften und die Ausbildung verschiedener Arten von adiabatischen Scherbänden in einer v-Titanlegierungcitations
- 2017High temperature and dynamic testing of AHSS for an analytical description of the adiabatic cutting processcitations
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
conferencepaper
Influence of surface pressure and tool materials on contact heating of aluminum
Abstract
<jats:p>Abstract. The implementation of lightweight design concepts can significantly benefit from using highly efficient heating technologies such as contact heating in thermo-mechanical processing of sheet metal components. The investigation of the influence of surface pressure and tool material on the heating time and the heating rate during contact heating is the subject of this publication. A specially manufactured contact heating tool with comprehensive temperature and force measurement was used for studying the effects of different contact plate materials (CuZn39Pb3 and CuCr1Zr), surface pressures (3 MPa - 15 MPa) and variable plate thicknesses (1.0 mm - 5.2 mm) during heating of the aluminum alloy EN AW-7075 up to the solution heat treatment temperature of 475 °C. It was observed that heating time is lower for thinner workpieces. Furthermore, heating times decrease and heating rates increase significantly with increasing surface pressure for a pressure range of 3 MPa - 9 MPa. A further increase in surface pressure is not recommended, because the benefit in terms of further reduction of the heating time is marginal and the strength of the contact plate materials at elevated temperatures is limited. Contact heating using copper plates is significantly faster compared to brass plates and the conventionally used steel plates. Brass plates, however, benefit more from an increase in surface pressure. Both investigated materials allow faster heating than conventional steel plates due to their higher thermal conductivity. Depending on the specific process parameters the heating process can be accelerated to less than one second. Thus, contact heating can be realized within the press cycle. </jats:p>