| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Mangoush, Enas
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (6/6 displayed)
- 2023Load‐bearing capacity and wear characteristics of short fiber‐reinforced composite and glass ceramic fixed partial denturescitations
- 2021Microstructure and Surface Characteristics of Short- Fiber Reinforced CAD/CAM Composite Blocks.citations
- 2021Effect of Fiber Reinforcement Type on the Performance of Large Posterior Restorations: A Review of In Vitro Studiescitations
- 2020Influence of Short Fiber- Reinforced Composites on Fracture Resistance of Single-Structure Restorations.citations
- 2017Comparative evaluation between glass and polyethylene fiber reinforced composites: A review of the current literature.citations
- 2013Short fiber reinforced composite: a new alternative for direct onlay restorations.citations
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
article
Short fiber reinforced composite: a new alternative for direct onlay restorations.
Abstract
<h4>Objectives</h4>To determine the static load-bearing capacity of direct composite onlay restorations made of novel filling composite resin system which combines short fiber-reinforced composite resin (FC) and conventional particulate filler composite resin (PFC).<h4>Methods</h4>Three groups of onlay restorations were fabricated (n = 8/group); Group A: made from conventional particulate filler composite resin (Z250, 3M-ESPE, USA, control), Group B: made from short fiber-reinforced composite resin (EverX posterior, StickTeck Ltd, member of GC group, Turku, Finland) as substructure with 1 mm surface layer of PFC, Group C: made from FC composite resin. The specimens were incrementally polymerized with a hand-light curing unit for 80 s before they were statically loaded with two different sizes (3 & 6 mm) of steel ball until fracture. Failure modes were visually examined. Data were analyzed using ANOVA (p = 0.05).<h4>Results</h4>ANOVA revealed that onlay restorations made from FC composite resin had statistically significantly higher load-bearing capacity (1733 N) ( p < 0.05) than the control PFC composite resin (1081 N). Onlays made of FC composite resin with a surface layer of PFC gave force values of 1405 N which was statistically higher than control group ( p < 0.05). No statistically significant difference was found in the load-bearing capacity between groups loaded by different ball sizes.<h4>Significance</h4>Onlay restorations combining base of short fiber reinforced composite resin as substructure and surface layer of conventional composite resin displayed promising performance in high load bearing areas.