Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Alogla, Saleh

  • Google
  • 4
  • 8
  • 53

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (4/4 displayed)

  • 2023Thermal properties, microstructure analysis, and environmental benefits of basalt fiber reinforced concretecitations
  • 2023Thermal properties, microstructure analysis, and environmental benefits of basalt fiber reinforced concrete6citations
  • 2022A Review on Failure Modes and Cracking Behaviors of Polypropylene Fibers Reinforced Concrete47citations
  • 2022Comparison between Electrical Resistivity Tomography and Geotechnical Field Data for Characterizing Soil Profilescitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Arbili, Mohamed M.
2 / 4 shared
Ahmad, Jawad
3 / 16 shared
Sodani, Khaled A. Alawi Al
2 / 6 shared
Hakamy, Ahmad
2 / 4 shared
Qsymah, Ansam
1 / 2 shared
Arbili, Mohamed Moafak
1 / 2 shared
Nergis, Dumitru Doru Burduhos
1 / 3 shared
Majdi, Ali
1 / 8 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Arbili, Mohamed M.
  • Ahmad, Jawad
  • Sodani, Khaled A. Alawi Al
  • Hakamy, Ahmad
  • Qsymah, Ansam
  • Arbili, Mohamed Moafak
  • Nergis, Dumitru Doru Burduhos
  • Majdi, Ali
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Comparison between Electrical Resistivity Tomography and Geotechnical Field Data for Characterizing Soil Profiles

  • Alogla, Saleh
Abstract

<jats:sec><jats:title>Background:</jats:title><jats:p>Electrical resistivity tests at a project site could be a valuable economical alternative to typical geotechnical soil exploration and a reliable source of data. In the present study, the soil at a constructed underground water tank site in Qassim Region – Saudi Arabia is investigated using the electrical resistivity testing method.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective:</jats:title><jats:p>The study aims to compare the results of traditional soil boreholes that were conducted at various stages of the project lifetime with the interpretation of soil resistivity test results.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods:</jats:title><jats:p>Eight soil boreholes were drilled at the water tank site to capture the nature of soil layers. The electrical resistivity of soil layers at the site is measured and used to investigate the ground subsurface of the project site. The geophysical software, ZondRes2d is utilized to analyze and interpret the collected data.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results:</jats:title><jats:p>Both geotechnical soil boreholes and geophysical electrical resistivity tests revealed similar soil profiles with three main layers comprising of backfill material, clay with expansive nature, and weathered limestone and marl. The results of the electrical resistivity tests are also affirmative of available resistance values of different soils in the literature.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion:</jats:title><jats:p>The study shows that electrical resistivity testing is reliable in capturing the soil nature which presents an attractive tool for preliminary investigation of the soil-related problems of distressed structures.</jats:p></jats:sec>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • resistivity
  • tomography
  • size-exclusion chromatography