Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Verma, Manisha

  • Google
  • 2
  • 16
  • 1

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2024Impact and Implications of Quantum Computing on Blockchain-based Electronic Health Record Systems1citations
  • 2023Ni2+ ion sensitive sustainable sensors based on 4-vinyl pyridine-ethyl acrylate copolymercitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Ravi, Vinayakumar
1 / 2 shared
Singh, Jagendra
1 / 1 shared
Alahmadi, Tahani Jaser
1 / 1 shared
Gupta, Preeti
1 / 1 shared
Singh, Mukund Pratap
1 / 1 shared
Shivahare, Basu Dev
1 / 1 shared
Singh, Prabhishek
1 / 1 shared
Kumar, Amit
1 / 39 shared
Dheer, Neelu
1 / 2 shared
Tomar, Praveen Kumar
1 / 1 shared
Khandelwal, Deepika
1 / 1 shared
Lal, Shyam
1 / 1 shared
Sachdeva, Shallu
1 / 1 shared
Kumari, Vandana
1 / 2 shared
Bhatia, Mamta
1 / 1 shared
Hooda, Sunita
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Ravi, Vinayakumar
  • Singh, Jagendra
  • Alahmadi, Tahani Jaser
  • Gupta, Preeti
  • Singh, Mukund Pratap
  • Shivahare, Basu Dev
  • Singh, Prabhishek
  • Kumar, Amit
  • Dheer, Neelu
  • Tomar, Praveen Kumar
  • Khandelwal, Deepika
  • Lal, Shyam
  • Sachdeva, Shallu
  • Kumari, Vandana
  • Bhatia, Mamta
  • Hooda, Sunita
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Impact and Implications of Quantum Computing on Blockchain-based Electronic Health Record Systems

  • Ravi, Vinayakumar
  • Singh, Jagendra
  • Alahmadi, Tahani Jaser
  • Gupta, Preeti
  • Singh, Mukund Pratap
  • Shivahare, Basu Dev
  • Singh, Prabhishek
  • Verma, Manisha
Abstract

<jats:sec><jats:title>Aims</jats:title><jats:p>This study will investigate the integration of quantum computing and blockchain technology of EHR systems, evaluating the potential and major vulnerabilities of the developed blockchain platforms. In addition, through this evaluation, in this paper, transaction capabilities, energy consumption, and quantum susceptibilities of Ethereum, Bitcoin, and Ripple are being evaluated. Further, research gaps on quantum implications and transition strategies to quantum-resistant systems for achieving secure, efficient, and patient-centric Healthcare 4.0 are identified.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>The embedding of quantum computing and blockchain technology within EHR systems represents the next wave of scientific development within the healthcare sector. However, at the same time, emerging quantum capabilities have raised serious vulnerabilities for major blockchain platforms. If Ethereum and Bitcoin display quantum threats regarding their high transaction capacities, then Ripple, with its high rate of transactions, truly presents a high stake in terms of quantum threats. Further, the energy consumption discrepancies pose some environmental impacts and point to the need for research on energy-efficient quantum-resistant systems.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>This research investigates the potential and vulnerabilities of major blockchain platforms with electronic health record systems in a new quantum computing environment. In that context, this work evaluates transaction capacities, quantum threats, and energy use for platforms like Ethereum, Bitcoin, and Ripple. Additionally, it seeks to identify research gaps and propose transition strategies toward a quantum-resistant system in support of the development of a secure and efficient Healthcare 4.0.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>This work focused on assessing the potential and vulnerabilities of blockchain platforms under quantum computing threats in EHR systems. We analyzed transaction processing rates, quantum susceptibilities, and energy consumption metrics for the Ethereum, Bitcoin, and Ripple platforms. A complete literature review is presented with respect to realistic quantum implications and practical transition strategies toward quantum-resistant systems oriented to support the development of secure and efficient Healthcare 4.0.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>The evaluations revealed that Ethereum processed 30 transactions per second and Bitcoin processed 7, with each having low quantum vulnerability. Ripple, at 1500 transactions per second, also had significant quantum vulnerabilities. In addition to energy use, Bitcoin consumes 707 kWh per single transaction compared with Ripple's 0.0078 kWh. Other gaps in research existed in real-world quantum consequences and considerations for transitioning to quantum-resistant systems, all of which are vital for making Healthcare 4.0 secure and efficient.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>This has underscored the transformative potential as well as the weaknesses involved in integrating quantum computing and blockchain technologies into EHR. However, Ethereum, Bitcoin, and Ripple vary in their transaction rates; all three face a similar quantum threat while having large differences in energy consumption. These are problems that would call for more research into quantum-resistant systems and strategic implementation. Actualization of a secure, efficient, and patient-centered Healthcare 4.0 will call for proactive research collaboration and strategic efforts towards ensuring technological and environmental sustainability.</jats:p></jats:sec>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • size-exclusion chromatography