Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Karuppanan, Saravanan

  • Google
  • 7
  • 19
  • 54

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (7/7 displayed)

  • 2024Study on current collector and electrolyte design/electrochemical behaviour of an in-plane lignin derived laser scribed graphene for microsupercapacitor application1citations
  • 2023Analytical Method for the Optimization of the Open-Hole and Filled-Hole Laminates at the Preliminary Design Stage2citations
  • 2023Lignin derived nanoparticle intercalation on nitrogen-doped graphene quantum dots for electrochemical sensing of cardiac biomarker5citations
  • 2022A Comprehensive Review on Biopolymer Mediated Nanomaterial Composites and Their Applications in Electrochemical Sensors16citations
  • 2021Mechanical Properties and Failure Mechanisms of Novel Resin-infused Thermoplastic and Conventional Thermoset 3D Fabric Composites21citations
  • 2021Hybrid optimization model for conjunctive use of surface and groundwater resources in water deficit irrigation system9citations
  • 2020Experimental characterization of compression performance of carbon–basalt hybrid filament wound pipes before and after impactcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Remesh, Sathaniswarman
2 / 2 shared
Raja, Pandian Bothi
3 / 4 shared
Edison, Thomas Nesakumar Jebakumar Immanuel
2 / 2 shared
Vasudevan, Mugashini
3 / 3 shared
Arumugam, Natarajan
2 / 5 shared
Ovinis, Mark
4 / 9 shared
Ibrahim, Mohamad Nasir Mohamad
2 / 10 shared
Perumal, Veeradasan
3 / 4 shared
Kumar, Raju Suresh
2 / 3 shared
Eng, Kee Kok
1 / 1 shared
Shah, Syed Zulfiqar Hussain
2 / 4 shared
Sajid, Zubair
2 / 2 shared
Gopinath, Subash C. B.
2 / 4 shared
Lee, Hooi Ling
1 / 5 shared
Ahmad, Faiz
1 / 9 shared
Megat-Yusoff, Puteri Sri Melor
1 / 1 shared
Farhood, Naseer H.
1 / 1 shared
Sultan, Mohamed T. H.
1 / 1 shared
Ya, Hamdan H.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Remesh, Sathaniswarman
  • Raja, Pandian Bothi
  • Edison, Thomas Nesakumar Jebakumar Immanuel
  • Vasudevan, Mugashini
  • Arumugam, Natarajan
  • Ovinis, Mark
  • Ibrahim, Mohamad Nasir Mohamad
  • Perumal, Veeradasan
  • Kumar, Raju Suresh
  • Eng, Kee Kok
  • Shah, Syed Zulfiqar Hussain
  • Sajid, Zubair
  • Gopinath, Subash C. B.
  • Lee, Hooi Ling
  • Ahmad, Faiz
  • Megat-Yusoff, Puteri Sri Melor
  • Farhood, Naseer H.
  • Sultan, Mohamed T. H.
  • Ya, Hamdan H.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Hybrid optimization model for conjunctive use of surface and groundwater resources in water deficit irrigation system

  • Karuppanan, Saravanan
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The Increasing demand for food production with limited available water resources poses a threat to agricultural activities. Conventional optimization algorithm increases the processing stage and it performed with in the space, which is allocated from user. Therefore, the proposed work is utilized to design with better performance results. The conjunctive allocation of water resources maximizes the net benefit of farmers. In this study, a novel hybrid optimization model developed is first of its kind to resolve the sharing of water resources conflict among different reaches based on a genetic algorithm (GA), bacterial foraging optimization (BFO) and ant colony optimization (ACO) to maximize the net benefit of the water deficit Sathanur reservoir command. The GA-based optimization model considered crop-related physical and economic parameters to derive optimal cropping patterns for three different conjunctive use policies and further allocation of surface and groundwater for different crops are enhanced with the BFO. The allocation of surface and groundwater for the head, middle and tail reaches obtained from BFO is considered as an input to the ACO as a guiding mechanism to attain an optimal cropping pattern. Comparing the average productivity values, Policy 3 (3.665 Rs/m3) has better values relating to Policy 1 (3.662 Rs/m3) and Policy 2 (3.440 Rs/m3). Thus, developed novel hybrid optimization model (GA-BFO-ACO) is very promising for enhancing farmer's net income and can be replicated in other irrigated regions to overcome chronic water problems. The productivity value of policy 3 was 6.54% greater than that of policy 2, whereas that of policy 1 was 6.45% greater. Overall, the comparison shows the better performance analysis of various optimization is done successfully.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface