Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Samy, Lina

  • Google
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2021CAD/CAM Surface Treatment And Type Of Adhesive Affect CAD/CAM Composite Bonding To Dentin1citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
El-Askary, Farid S.
1 / 4 shared
Chart of publication period
2021

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • El-Askary, Farid S.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

CAD/CAM Surface Treatment And Type Of Adhesive Affect CAD/CAM Composite Bonding To Dentin

  • Samy, Lina
  • El-Askary, Farid S.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of CAD/CAM surface treatments and different adhesives on the shear bond strength (SBS) of a CAD/CAM composite to dentin. Materials and Methods: In total, 120-flat dentin surfaces were prepared, and divided into 12 groups (n=10) according to: 1- CAD/CAM surface treatment, and 2: Type of adhesive. A total of 120 CAD/CAM composite rods (2mmx2mmx4mm) were prepared, and sandblasted. The rods were left without further treatment, ultrasonically cleaned in distilled water, or acid etched using 35% phosphoric acid. The dual- and self-cured adhesives were applied to dentin, in etch-and-rinse or self-etching modes and the rods were cemented using dual-cured resin cement. The SBS test was run at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min until failure. Data were analyzed using Two-Way ANOVA/Tukey test, P=0.05. Results: Factors “surface treatment”, “adhesive” and “surface treatment x adhesive” had significant effect on SBS (P0.05). Sandblasting had the highest significant SBS among surface treatments (P<0.05). Self-cured adhesive showed higher SBS compared to dual-cured adhesive in etch-and-rinse mode (P<0.05). Mixed failure was the predominate failure (59.2%). Conclusion: Sandblasting improved the SBS of a CAD/CAM composite to dentin. The use of dual-cured universal and self-cured adhesives in their simplified self-etching approach is preferrable.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • strength
  • composite
  • cement
  • etching
  • resin
  • collision-induced dissociation