Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Wahman, David G.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 2
  • 10

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2010Effects of Natural Organic Matter on PCB‐Activated Carbon Sorption Kinetics: Implications for Sediment Capping Applications10citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Fairey, Julian L.
1 / 1 shared
Lowry, Gregory V.
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2010

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Fairey, Julian L.
  • Lowry, Gregory V.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Effects of Natural Organic Matter on PCB‐Activated Carbon Sorption Kinetics: Implications for Sediment Capping Applications

  • Wahman, David G.
  • Fairey, Julian L.
  • Lowry, Gregory V.
Abstract

<jats:p>In situ capping of polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB)–contaminated sediments with a layer of activated carbon has been proposed, but several questions remain regarding the long‐term effectiveness of this remediation strategy. Here, we assess the degree to which kinetic limitations, size exclusion effects, and electrostatic repulsions impaired PCB sorption to activated carbon. Sorption of 11 PCB congeners with activated carbon was studied in fixed bed reactors with organic‐free water (OFW) and Suwannee River natural organic matter (SR–NOM), made by reconstituting freeze‐dried SR–NOM at a concentration of 10 mg L<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> as carbon. In the OFW test, no PCBs were detected in the column effluent over the 390‐d study, indicating that PCB‐activated carbon equilibrium sorption capacities may be achieved before breakthrough even at the relatively high hydraulic loading rate (HLR) of 3.1 m h<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> However, in the SR–NOM fixed‐bed test, partial PCB breakthrough occurred over the entire 320‐d test (HLRs of 3.1‐, 1.5‐, and 0.8 m h<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>). Simulations from a modified pore and surface diffusion model indicated that external (film diffusion) mass transfer was the dominant rate‐limiting step but that internal (pore diffusion) mass transfer limitations were also present. The external mass transfer limitation was likely caused by formation of PCB–NOM complexes that reduced PCB sorption through a combination of (i) increased film diffusion resistance; (ii) size exclusion effects; and (iii) electrostatic repulsive forces between the PCBs and the NOM‐coated activated carbon. However, the seepage velocities in the SR–NOM fixed bed test were about 1000 times higher than would be expected in a sediment cap. Therefore, additional studies are needed to assess whether the mass transfer limitations described here would be likely to manifest themselves at the lower seepage velocities observed in practice.</jats:p>

Topics
  • pore
  • surface
  • Carbon
  • simulation