Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Verma, Madhushi

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 10

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2021Recop: Fine-grained Opinions and Collaborative Filtering based Recommender System for Industry 5.010citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Kumar, Sunil
1 / 14 shared
Kotecha, K.
1 / 1 shared
Singh, Pardeep
1 / 12 shared
Bathla, Gourav
1 / 1 shared
Garg, Deepak
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2021

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Kumar, Sunil
  • Kotecha, K.
  • Singh, Pardeep
  • Bathla, Gourav
  • Garg, Deepak
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Recop: Fine-grained Opinions and Collaborative Filtering based Recommender System for Industry 5.0

  • Kumar, Sunil
  • Kotecha, K.
  • Singh, Pardeep
  • Bathla, Gourav
  • Garg, Deepak
  • Verma, Madhushi
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>In the futuristic Industry framework, user interactions with the product are seamlessly integrated with the product life cycle. A recommender system can be considered as an information filtering tool that provides suggestions to users about products, music, friend, topic, etc. This suggestion is based on the interest of users. Several research works have been carried out to improve recommendation accuracy by using matrix factorization, trust-based, hybrid-based, machine learning, and deep learning techniques. However, very few existing works have leveraged textual opinions for the recommendation to the best of our knowledge. Existing research works have focused only on numerical ratings, which do not reflect actual user behaviour. In this research work, sentiments of textual opinions are analyzed for an in-depth analysis of users' behaviour. Furthermore, Natural Language Processing techniques such as lemmatization, stemming, stop-word removal, Part-of-Speech (POS) tagging are applied to textual opinions. Recommendation accuracy is improved by using the proposed score Recop calculated from opinion sentiments. Furthermore, the sparsity issue is resolved by using our proposed approach. Amazon and Yelp review datasets are used for Experiment analysis. Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) values are improved significantly using the proposed approach compared to the existing approaches. MAE and RMSE scores on the Yelp dataset are <jats:italic>0.85</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>1.51</jats:italic>, respectively. Additionally, MAE and RMSE scores on the Amazon dataset are <jats:italic>0.66</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>0.93</jats:italic>, respectively, significantly contributing to our proposed approach.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • experiment
  • machine learning
  • microwave-assisted extraction