Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Gupta, Nakul

  • Google
  • 4
  • 35
  • 17

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (4/4 displayed)

  • 2024Tribological investigation into nickel-coated graphite polytetrafluoroethylene composites3citations
  • 2024Training Robust T1-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Liver Segmentation Models Using Ensembles of Datasets with Different Contrast Protocols and Liver Disease Etiologies1citations
  • 2024Experimental Study on the Substitution of Waste Rubber Tyre Ash with Natural Sand in the Cement Concretecitations
  • 2023Investigation on the impact of elevated temperature on sustainable geopolymer composite13citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Setti, Srinivasu Gangi
1 / 1 shared
Sandeep, Cd
1 / 1 shared
Dude, Niranjan
1 / 1 shared
Deepthi, Yp
1 / 1 shared
Anitha, D.
1 / 2 shared
Sahu, Santosh Kumar
1 / 6 shared
Celaya, Adrian
1 / 1 shared
Beretta, Laura
1 / 1 shared
Victor, David
1 / 1 shared
Eltaher, Mohamed
1 / 2 shared
Glenn, Rachel
1 / 1 shared
Fuentes, David
1 / 1 shared
Netherton, Tucker
1 / 1 shared
Patel, Nihil
1 / 1 shared
Calderone, Tiffany
1 / 1 shared
Koay, Eugene
1 / 1 shared
Sanchez, Jessica
1 / 1 shared
Brock, Kristy
1 / 1 shared
Savannah, Kari Brewer
1 / 1 shared
Cagley, Matthew
1 / 1 shared
Elsaiey, Ahmed
1 / 1 shared
Cleere, Darrel
1 / 1 shared
Chandra, Pradeep Kumar
1 / 3 shared
Hemanth Raju, T.
1 / 1 shared
Nagpal, Amandeep
1 / 2 shared
Prakash, Akula
1 / 3 shared
Mohammad, Q.
1 / 1 shared
Kumar, Vinit
1 / 1 shared
Kumar, Munesh
1 / 1 shared
Salmaan, Ummal
1 / 1 shared
Salem, Karrar Hazim
1 / 4 shared
Meena, Rahul Kumar
1 / 1 shared
Singh, Indrajeet
1 / 2 shared
Reddy, M. Madhusudhan
1 / 1 shared
Verma, Manvendra
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Setti, Srinivasu Gangi
  • Sandeep, Cd
  • Dude, Niranjan
  • Deepthi, Yp
  • Anitha, D.
  • Sahu, Santosh Kumar
  • Celaya, Adrian
  • Beretta, Laura
  • Victor, David
  • Eltaher, Mohamed
  • Glenn, Rachel
  • Fuentes, David
  • Netherton, Tucker
  • Patel, Nihil
  • Calderone, Tiffany
  • Koay, Eugene
  • Sanchez, Jessica
  • Brock, Kristy
  • Savannah, Kari Brewer
  • Cagley, Matthew
  • Elsaiey, Ahmed
  • Cleere, Darrel
  • Chandra, Pradeep Kumar
  • Hemanth Raju, T.
  • Nagpal, Amandeep
  • Prakash, Akula
  • Mohammad, Q.
  • Kumar, Vinit
  • Kumar, Munesh
  • Salmaan, Ummal
  • Salem, Karrar Hazim
  • Meena, Rahul Kumar
  • Singh, Indrajeet
  • Reddy, M. Madhusudhan
  • Verma, Manvendra
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Training Robust T1-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Liver Segmentation Models Using Ensembles of Datasets with Different Contrast Protocols and Liver Disease Etiologies

  • Celaya, Adrian
  • Beretta, Laura
  • Victor, David
  • Eltaher, Mohamed
  • Glenn, Rachel
  • Fuentes, David
  • Netherton, Tucker
  • Patel, Nihil
  • Calderone, Tiffany
  • Koay, Eugene
  • Sanchez, Jessica
  • Brock, Kristy
  • Savannah, Kari Brewer
  • Cagley, Matthew
  • Elsaiey, Ahmed
  • Gupta, Nakul
  • Cleere, Darrel
Abstract

<title>Abstract</title><p>Image segmentation of the liver is an important step in several treatments for liver cancer. However, manual segmentation at a large scale is not practical, leading to increasing reliance on deep learning models to automatically segment the liver. This manuscript develops a deep learning model to segment the liver on T1w MR images. We sought to determine the best architecture by training, validating, and testing three different deep learning architectures using a total of 819 T1w MR images gathered from six different datasets, both publicly and internally available. Our experiments compared each architecture’s testing performance when trained on data from the same dataset via 5-fold cross validation to its testing performance when trained on all other datasets. Models trained using nnUNet achieved mean Dice-Sorensen similarity coefficients &gt; 90% when tested on each of the six datasets individually. The performance of these models suggests that an nnUNet liver segmentation model trained on a large and diverse collection of T1w MR images would be robust to potential changes in contrast protocol and disease etiology.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • experiment