Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Benyahi, Karim

  • Google
  • 5
  • 4
  • 2

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (5/5 displayed)

  • 2023Multivariate regression analysis to strength and stiffness evaluation of masonry infillscitations
  • 2022Effect of the capacity ratio developed at column-beam nodes and evaluation of its random degradation impact on the formation of global ruin mechanismscitations
  • 2022Effect of the capacity ratio developed at column-beam nodes and evaluation of its random degradation impact on the formation of global ruin mechanismscitations
  • 2021Periodic homogenization and damage evolution in RVE composite material with inclusion2citations
  • 2020New Approach for Simulating Reinforced Concrete Walls in Quasi-static Loadingcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Bouafia, Youcef
2 / 3 shared
Adjrad, Arezki
2 / 2 shared
Messas, Amar
2 / 2 shared
Benakli, Sarah
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2022
2021
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Bouafia, Youcef
  • Adjrad, Arezki
  • Messas, Amar
  • Benakli, Sarah
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Multivariate regression analysis to strength and stiffness evaluation of masonry infills

  • Bouafia, Youcef
  • Adjrad, Arezki
  • Benyahi, Karim
  • Messas, Amar
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Reinforced concrete frames with masonry infill are widely utilized in construction worldwide. This present study aimed to investigate the behaviour of masonry infill. Firstly, the compressive strength of the masonry infill and the evaluation methods were examined, specifically prism tests and wallette tests. The study collected a substantial database, revealing that wallette tests indicate higher stiffness compared to prism tests. Based on the findings, it is recommended to employ prism tests for assessing the stiffness of masonry and wallette tests for evaluating the compressive strength of masonry. Furthermore, the study assessed the performance of 18 empirical models to identify the most suitable model for predicting the compressive strength of masonry using the two testing methods (wallette and prism). To evaluate the strength of masonry infills under horizontal loading, a database of reinforced concrete frames with masonry infills was collected. The infill responses were determined by calculating the differences between the infilled frame and the bare frame. By employing multivariate regression analysis, equations were proposed for the various parameters of the quadri-linear relationship governing the behaviour of masonry infill. A comparison of the equations proposed in this present study with those present in the literature demonstrated their reliability.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • strength