Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Asrani, Anjas

  • Google
  • 2
  • 11
  • 4

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2024Assessment of carbonized himalayan chir pine biomass as an eco-friendly adsorbent for effective removal of industrial dyes4citations
  • 2023Bending Mechanics of the Soft Pneumatic Single Air Chamber Bending Actuatorcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Prasad, Brijesh
1 / 1 shared
Goswami, Rekha
1 / 1 shared
Bajaj, Mohit
1 / 1 shared
Jain, Ankur
1 / 3 shared
Gupta, Munish Kumar
1 / 6 shared
Mishra, Abhilasha
1 / 1 shared
Zaitsev, Ievgen
1 / 1 shared
Sahu, Rajesh
1 / 2 shared
Gill, Fateh Singh
1 / 1 shared
Gariya, Narendra
1 / 1 shared
Nautiyal, Hemant
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Prasad, Brijesh
  • Goswami, Rekha
  • Bajaj, Mohit
  • Jain, Ankur
  • Gupta, Munish Kumar
  • Mishra, Abhilasha
  • Zaitsev, Ievgen
  • Sahu, Rajesh
  • Gill, Fateh Singh
  • Gariya, Narendra
  • Nautiyal, Hemant
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Bending Mechanics of the Soft Pneumatic Single Air Chamber Bending Actuator

  • Gariya, Narendra
  • Asrani, Anjas
  • Nautiyal, Hemant
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The present study aims to quantify the bending of soft pneumatic actuators used in soft robots for different loading conditions. The bending angle was measured for the Ecoflex-OO50 silicone rubber-made hollow beam of different top layer thickness (1, 1.5, and 2 mm) under the pneumatic pressure of 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 kPa using the analytical modeling using Euler Bernoulli beam theory and FEM analysis tools. The increase in top layer thickness exhibited a decrease in bending angle, while an increase in pressure exhibits an increase in bending angle, from both tools of analysis. However, the modeling technique gave pretty high bending angle values as those obtained from FEM analysis. For the validation, Ecoflex-OO50 (silicon rubber) specimens of the same dimensions, as used in the FEM analysis and analytical model were taken and applied with the same pressure intensity, as in the FEM analysis and analytical model. The values obtained from the actual testing of the material were closer to the value of FEM analysis, the reason for the large difference in actual bending angle values and values obtained by the modeling is the assumptions taken into consideration while applying Euler Bernoulli beam theory.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • theory
  • Silicon
  • rubber