Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Byarugaba, Frederick

  • Google
  • 1
  • 2
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2023Umbilical Stump Colonization and Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns of Bacteria from Umbilical Stumps of Neonates Admitted at Holy Innocents Children’s Hospital, Mbarara, South Western Ugandacitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Bazira, Joel
1 / 3 shared
Mukundane, Bruno
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Bazira, Joel
  • Mukundane, Bruno
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Umbilical Stump Colonization and Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns of Bacteria from Umbilical Stumps of Neonates Admitted at Holy Innocents Children’s Hospital, Mbarara, South Western Uganda

  • Bazira, Joel
  • Byarugaba, Frederick
  • Mukundane, Bruno
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p><jats:bold>Introduction</jats:bold>: Every year a million deaths of neonates occur worldwide due to bacteria that has ascended through the umbilical stump leading to serious infection. An umbilical stump that has just separated is known to be the best route for bacterial entrance leading to development of serious infections. It also acts as a reservoir for bacteria which potentially may gain access to the blood flow within first 2–3 days of life when the umbilical vein is still patent. During neonatal period, the umbilical stump takes 1-2weeks to fall off under normal circumstances (WHO). Therefore understanding umbilical stump colonization is relevant within 14 days before the stump falls off. The most common isolated and recovered organisms that are known for colonization of the umbilical stump are <jats:italic>Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli</jats:italic> and group B <jats:italic>Streptococcus</jats:italic>. No matter the type of colonizing bacteria, this kind of colonization normally leads to serious life-threatening infection.<jats:bold>Objective</jats:bold>: The objective of this study was to determine the umbilical stump colonization and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of bacteria isolated from umbilical stumps of neonates admitted at Holy Innocents Children’s Hospital. <jats:bold>Methods</jats:bold>: This study used a cross-sectional study and 200 participants were enrolled from neonatal ward in the period of May-June 2022. Samples were aseptically taken off from neonates using a sterile cotton swab which were then cultured and the colonizing organisms isolated after which antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done using Kirby Bauer disk diffusion method.<jats:bold>Results</jats:bold>: After culture of 200 samples, only 35 (17.5%) showed growth. Of the isolated organisms <jats:italic>Staphylococcus aureus</jats:italic> had the highest number of 15 (42.9%), this was followed by <jats:italic>E.coli</jats:italic> with 8 (22.9%), then <jats:italic>K.pneumoniae</jats:italic> at 4 (11.4%), <jats:italic>Proteus spp</jats:italic> at 4 (11.4%, then <jats:italic>Streptococcus spp</jats:italic> at 2 (5.7) and finally <jats:italic>Pseudomonas spp</jats:italic> at 2 (5.7%). All <jats:italic>Staphylococcus species</jats:italic> were sensitive to Vancomycin whereas all <jats:italic>E.coli</jats:italic> species were resistant to Imipenem, Tetracycline, Erythromycin and Ampicillin. All <jats:italic>Klebsiella</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>Streptococcus</jats:italic> species were 100% sensitive to Ciprofloxacin, Chloramphenicol and Gentamicin. Chloramphenicol had the highest sensitivity of 85.7% followed by Gentamicin at 62.9% and Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole had the highest resistance of 62.9% which was followed by Tetracycline with the resistance of 54.3%. All <jats:italic>Streptococcus species</jats:italic> were sensitive to Cefoxitin, Chloramphenicol, Erythromycin and Clindamycin whereas all <jats:italic>Pseudomonas</jats:italic> species were sensitive to Ceftazidime, Piperacillin and Piperacillin-tazobactam.<jats:bold>Conclusion</jats:bold>: The prevalence of umbilical stump colonisation at HICH was high at 17.5% and the main causative agents are <jats:italic>Staphylococcus aureus</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>Escherichia.coli</jats:italic>. These organisms are resistant to commonly used antibiotics like Ciprofloxacin, Ceftriaxone and Amoxicillin-Clavulanic acid.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • susceptibility