Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Al-Abdrabalnabi, Ridha

  • Google
  • 1
  • 4
  • 2

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2023The Evolution of Fracture Surface Parameters in Heterogeneous Carbonate Reservoirs Employing Chelating Agents as Acid Fracturing Fluids2citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Aljawad, Murtada Saleh
1 / 2 shared
Mahmoud, Mohamed
1 / 5 shared
Khan, Hasan J.
1 / 1 shared
Ramadan, Mustafa Al
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Aljawad, Murtada Saleh
  • Mahmoud, Mohamed
  • Khan, Hasan J.
  • Ramadan, Mustafa Al
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

The Evolution of Fracture Surface Parameters in Heterogeneous Carbonate Reservoirs Employing Chelating Agents as Acid Fracturing Fluids

  • Aljawad, Murtada Saleh
  • Al-Abdrabalnabi, Ridha
  • Mahmoud, Mohamed
  • Khan, Hasan J.
  • Ramadan, Mustafa Al
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Acid fracturing is one technique for increasing carbonate formation productivity. The injection of acid causes dissolution along the fracture, which results in conductivity. The success of the acid fracturing process is influenced by several factors, including acid type, acid concentration, formation type, and contact time. Many fluids have been examined for their ability to maintain conductivity, beginning with strong acids such as hydrochloric acid (HCl) and progressing to weak acids such as organic acids. The main issues with HCl are its rapid and strong reactions, as well as its ability to corrode wellbore tubular.</jats:p><jats:p>This research investigated the impact of chelating agents such as GLDA and DTPA on acid fracturing stimulation to maintain fracture conductivity in heterogeneous carbonate formations formed of calcite and dolomite. At reservoir temperature, chelating agents are less reactive than HCl and do not require a corrosion inhibitor. the image illustrations were observed using a laser profilometer prior to and after acid treatment. The fracture conductivity was measured before and after acid etching with a core-flooding system at various flow rates and closure stresses.</jats:p><jats:p>The results show that chelating agents improved fracture conductivity sufficiently when compared to HCl for layered carbonate formation. Remarkably, DTPA softened the rock and made change in surface roughness more than GLDA, while GLDA improved fracture conductivity more than the other one. the reason behind this is that DTPA smashed the fracture surface uniformly in some areas instead of generating channels like HCl and GLDA, resulting in a non-significant improvement in fracture conductivity when compared to the other two acids.</jats:p><jats:p>For the first time, chelating agents were investigated and tested as acid fracturing fluids on heterogeneous carbonate reservoirs to generate sustainable conductivity.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • corrosion
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • layered
  • etching