Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Andrianov, Alexey

  • Google
  • 2
  • 17
  • 8

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2023Nanospheres Application for Conformance Control in Low-Permeability Carbonate Formation in Oman Block 51citations
  • 2022First Polymer Injectivity Test in the Wara Formation of the Great Burgan Field: Strategic Milestone to Fast-Track Phased Commercial Polymer-Flooding Development7citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Hasani, M.
1 / 1 shared
Naabi, A. M.
1 / 1 shared
Kindi, Z.
1 / 1 shared
Wang, Y.
1 / 134 shared
Busaidi, K.
1 / 1 shared
Liu, E.
1 / 8 shared
Skeans, Elii
1 / 1 shared
Dean, Elio S.
1 / 1 shared
Al-Murayri, Mohammed T.
1 / 1 shared
Al-Qattan, Abrar
1 / 1 shared
Hassan, Abrahim Abdelgadir
1 / 1 shared
Al-Ghanim, Wafaa
1 / 1 shared
Jadhav, Prakash
1 / 1 shared
Kakade, Shweta
1 / 1 shared
Banerjee, Anirban
1 / 1 shared
Liu, Echo
1 / 1 shared
Pitts, Malcolm J.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Hasani, M.
  • Naabi, A. M.
  • Kindi, Z.
  • Wang, Y.
  • Busaidi, K.
  • Liu, E.
  • Skeans, Elii
  • Dean, Elio S.
  • Al-Murayri, Mohammed T.
  • Al-Qattan, Abrar
  • Hassan, Abrahim Abdelgadir
  • Al-Ghanim, Wafaa
  • Jadhav, Prakash
  • Kakade, Shweta
  • Banerjee, Anirban
  • Liu, Echo
  • Pitts, Malcolm J.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

First Polymer Injectivity Test in the Wara Formation of the Great Burgan Field: Strategic Milestone to Fast-Track Phased Commercial Polymer-Flooding Development

  • Skeans, Elii
  • Dean, Elio S.
  • Al-Murayri, Mohammed T.
  • Al-Qattan, Abrar
  • Hassan, Abrahim Abdelgadir
  • Al-Ghanim, Wafaa
  • Andrianov, Alexey
  • Jadhav, Prakash
  • Kakade, Shweta
  • Banerjee, Anirban
  • Liu, Echo
  • Pitts, Malcolm J.
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>This paper sheds light on the design and field results of a strategic Long-Term Polymer Injectivity Test (LTPIT) to de-risk phased commercial polymer-flooding in the largest sandstone field worldwide in pursuit of production acceleration, reserves growth and cost optimization. Effluent water with up to 170,000ppm TDS was used in conjunction with a pre-selected sulfonated polymer to evaluate injectivity at multiple rates and polymer concentrations under sub-fracturing conditions. Reservoir parting pressure was judiciously estimated to be around 2,500 psi. Polymer and water injected below parting pressure flowed into and through the Wara reservoir matrix as evidenced by the increase in downhole pressure with increasing injection rate in line with Darcy’s law. Polymer solutions expressed in-situ viscosities of up to 2.75 cP when injected below fracture parting pressure while displaying pseudoplastic flow characteristics. Water on the other hand displayed Newtonian behavior. Polymer adsorption onto the Wara formation developed a residual resistance factor of 1.17 for an effective water permeability reduction of approximately 20%. Polymer injection evidently improved reservoir conformance and resulted in more uniform zonal intake. Injected fluid distribution between 4,693 to 4,706 ft decreased from 85% to 71% and injection out of this depth range increased from 3% to 15.5%. Step rate testing with varying polymer concentrations evinced that increasing polymer concentration will decrease injection rate and, therefore, the duration of any mobility control polymer flood in the Wara reservoir will be affected by polymer concentration. A dynamic model was developed using CMG STARS and calibrated to wellbore petrophysics, polymer concentrations, downhole pressures, injection rates and pertinent surveillance/monitoring data. Numerical simulation sensitivity analysis indicates that 1800 ppm of the pre-selected sulfonated polymer (ZLPAM 40520), dissolved in effluent water, is the optimal concentration with 0.8 PV of injection being the optimal injected volume in terms of oil recovery and project economics. The benefits associated with polymer injection in terms of production acceleration, incremental recovery and cost optimization can be significantly increased by fast-tracking polymer injection using optimal well configuration. Performance forecasts using field data demonstrated that polymer injection has the potential to considerably reduce water-handling requirements, thus resulting in major cost savings. Furthermore, assuming an oil price of $80/bbl, drilling additional wells to establish 40-acre spacing for polymer injection can result in 9.4% incremental recovery at a Unit Technical Cost (UTC) of 19.3 $/bbl inclusive of the cost associated with polymer, additional wells, surface facilities, operations and maintenance. The results of this strategic field trial establish the techno-economic feasibility of phased commercial polymer-flooding in the Wara reservoir of the Greater Burgan field in Kuwait.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • polymer
  • mobility
  • simulation
  • permeability