Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Busch, Andreas

  • Google
  • 5
  • 24
  • 232

Heriot-Watt University

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (5/5 displayed)

  • 2022Comparison of Porosity and Permeability from Drill Cuttings and Core Samples for Mudrockscitations
  • 2021MATSAS16citations
  • 2016Shale porosity - What can we learn from different methods?8citations
  • 2009European inter-laboratory comparison of high pressure CO2 sorption isotherms. I153citations
  • 2009Caprock and overburden processes in geological CO2 storage55citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Sazali, Wan Muhammad Luqman Bin
1 / 1 shared
Pipich, Vitaliy
1 / 20 shared
Rezaeyan, Amirsaman
1 / 1 shared
Bertier, Pieter
1 / 2 shared
Pipich, V.
1 / 7 shared
Feoktystov, A.
1 / 2 shared
Coorn, A.
1 / 1 shared
Kampman, N.
1 / 1 shared
Schweinar, K.
1 / 8 shared
Amann-Hildenbrand, A.
1 / 1 shared
Leu, L.
1 / 1 shared
Krooss, Bernhard M.
2 / 3 shared
Li, D.
1 / 22 shared
Prinz, D.
1 / 1 shared
Wolf, K. H. A. A.
1 / 2 shared
Hemert, P. Van
1 / 1 shared
Weireld, G. De
1 / 3 shared
Billemont, P.
1 / 1 shared
Charriére, D.
1 / 1 shared
Gensterblum, Y.
1 / 1 shared
Stanjek, Helge
1 / 1 shared
Kronimus, Alexander
1 / 1 shared
Alles, Sascha
1 / 1 shared
Wollenweber, Jens
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2021
2016
2009

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Sazali, Wan Muhammad Luqman Bin
  • Pipich, Vitaliy
  • Rezaeyan, Amirsaman
  • Bertier, Pieter
  • Pipich, V.
  • Feoktystov, A.
  • Coorn, A.
  • Kampman, N.
  • Schweinar, K.
  • Amann-Hildenbrand, A.
  • Leu, L.
  • Krooss, Bernhard M.
  • Li, D.
  • Prinz, D.
  • Wolf, K. H. A. A.
  • Hemert, P. Van
  • Weireld, G. De
  • Billemont, P.
  • Charriére, D.
  • Gensterblum, Y.
  • Stanjek, Helge
  • Kronimus, Alexander
  • Alles, Sascha
  • Wollenweber, Jens
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Comparison of Porosity and Permeability from Drill Cuttings and Core Samples for Mudrocks

  • Busch, Andreas
  • Sazali, Wan Muhammad Luqman Bin
Abstract

<p>Understanding CO<sub>2</sub> migration through the reservoir seal is one of the main challenges in assessing caprock integrity, thereby ensuring safe and long-term CO<sub>2</sub> containment and storage. The determination of seal rock properties using core sample analysis or well data is important to predict matrix migration of CO<sub>2</sub> to minimise the risk of capillary leakage. However, core samples and continuous well log data of caprock sections are expensive and limited. This issue can potentially be resolved by using cuttings, that are readily available from drilling, with no additional coring cost. However, before drill cuttings can be used as an alternative, rock properties (porosity and permeability) values from drill cuttings must be correlated with rock properties from the preserved core data, for proof-of-concept purposes. In CO<sub>2</sub> storage sites, the caprock zone is usually comprised of low permeability mudrocks. Due to the low permeability of caprocks with values &lt;1 microDarcy (10<sup>-18</sup> m<sup>2</sup>) conventional core analysis is insufficient to determine porosity and permeability. We here use helium pycnometry for porosity determination on plugs and mercury porosimetry on cuttings. Meanwhile, the selected methods for permeability determination is an unsteady-state technique for plugs, and pressure decay / GRI method for cuttings, as both methods can measure permeability down to or even below nanoDarcy (10<sup>-21</sup> m<sup>2</sup>). For the proof-of-concept study, we expect a correlation between plug and cuttings permeabilities of R<sup>2</sup>&gt; 0.8 as indication of success criteria, based on strong effect size from statistics point of view. Using data from literature, permeability and porosity values from core samples match the permeability from cuttings with R<sup>2</sup> &gt;0.9. The R<sup>2</sup> value for cutting versus plug porosity is 0.95, which is satisfies the success criteria as well. The correlations show that porosity and permeability values from cuttings are comparable to values from plugs and can be used as an approximation for the uncored zone. This proof-of-concept study marks the beginning of a full fledge research study to establish porosity and permeability relationships in caprocks, which can be used as inputs in predicting CO<sub>2</sub> matrix migration for safe geological storage of CO<sub>2</sub>. In addition, this approach can be applied to unconventional oil and gas studies, with potential cost saving from coring operations.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • permeability
  • porosity
  • porosimetry
  • Mercury