Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Acosta, Tito

  • Google
  • 1
  • 9
  • 10

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2022Screening of Topside Challenges Related to Polymer Presence in the Back Produced Fluids – Casabe Case Study10citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Blazquez-Egea, Christian
1 / 1 shared
Mouret, Aurélie
1 / 1 shared
Quintero, Henderson
1 / 1 shared
Hénaut, Isabelle
1 / 2 shared
Gutierrez, Mauricio
1 / 2 shared
Jermann, Cyril
1 / 1 shared
Vargas, Nadine
1 / 1 shared
Jimenez, Robinson
1 / 1 shared
Salaün, Mathieu
1 / 4 shared
Chart of publication period
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Blazquez-Egea, Christian
  • Mouret, Aurélie
  • Quintero, Henderson
  • Hénaut, Isabelle
  • Gutierrez, Mauricio
  • Jermann, Cyril
  • Vargas, Nadine
  • Jimenez, Robinson
  • Salaün, Mathieu
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Screening of Topside Challenges Related to Polymer Presence in the Back Produced Fluids – Casabe Case Study

  • Blazquez-Egea, Christian
  • Mouret, Aurélie
  • Quintero, Henderson
  • Hénaut, Isabelle
  • Gutierrez, Mauricio
  • Jermann, Cyril
  • Vargas, Nadine
  • Acosta, Tito
  • Jimenez, Robinson
  • Salaün, Mathieu
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Polymer enhanced oil recovery (EOR) pilots were implemented in various mature oilfield reservoirs in Colombia with encouraging results. That chemical EOR technology is often considered as a promising process to faster recover oil. To increase the chance of success of such an industrial project it is important not to neglect the potential impact of residual polymer in back produced effluents. The objective of this work is to highlight the impact of back-produced EOR polymer at the laboratory scale on various topside equipment before deploying the polymer injection at wider scale in a heavy oil field (18° API).</jats:p><jats:p>A topside facility review was first performed to collect operational conditions and parameters, to identify applied treatment technologies and to define relevant sampling locations for the laboratory study. The impact of the residual acrylamide/ATBS ter-polymer selected for the future polymer implementation was then explored in a set of experiments as part of a dedicated laboratory workflow representing the whole surface treatment chain. The scope of the study has covered primary separation, static gravity water clarifying, deep-bed filtration and heater fouling. Large residual polymer concentration and water cut ranges were investigated to anticipate some produced fluid composition change over time.</jats:p><jats:p>In the case studied, the selected polymer does not stabilize tight water-in-oil emulsions, but it has a negative impact on the water quality. Some compatibility issues are observed with incumbent demulsifiers, which seems to be sensitive to both polymer concentration and water cut. The fouling risk of heat exchanger is very low in the testing conditions. In the water de-oiling side, filtration and gravity settling performance are reduced but the right chemical and equipment combination enables to obtain a better water quality and to meet injection specifications targets.</jats:p><jats:p>Novel/Additive Information: This work illustrates that management of produced fluid containing EOR polymer has to be considered as early as possible in the project implementation. It also points out that laboratory experiments are useful to better appraise and mitigate the potential operational issues. All the results obtained in such a study are valuable guideline and input data for treatment facilities upgrade studies. In polymer flooding roadmap implementation, it is key to bond operational conditions and laboratory parameters in order to be as close as possible to the field conditions as each case is unique.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • polymer
  • experiment