Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Lazreq, Nabila

  • Google
  • 2
  • 15
  • 7

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2020Tight Oil from Shale Rock in UAE: A Success Story of Unconventional Fracturing2citations
  • 2020First Multistage Fracturing of Horizontal Well Drilled in Conventional Tight Carbonate Reservoir in An Onshore Field in the UAE – Challenges and Lessons Learned5citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Kalbani, Muhannad Al
1 / 1 shared
Bukovac, Tomislav
1 / 1 shared
Kumar, Rakesh
1 / 22 shared
Povstyanova, Magdalena
1 / 1 shared
Luo, Yin
1 / 1 shared
Hashmi, Abdullah Ali Al
1 / 1 shared
Dahmani, Fatima Al
1 / 1 shared
Marzouqi, Hassan Al
1 / 1 shared
Shamisi, Eisa Al
1 / 1 shared
Aftab, Muhammad Nadeem
1 / 3 shared
Dunlop, Tyson
1 / 1 shared
Leguizamon, Javier
1 / 1 shared
Nechakh, Abderaouf
1 / 1 shared
Subaihi, Maad
1 / 1 shared
Talib, Noor
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Kalbani, Muhannad Al
  • Bukovac, Tomislav
  • Kumar, Rakesh
  • Povstyanova, Magdalena
  • Luo, Yin
  • Hashmi, Abdullah Ali Al
  • Dahmani, Fatima Al
  • Marzouqi, Hassan Al
  • Shamisi, Eisa Al
  • Aftab, Muhammad Nadeem
  • Dunlop, Tyson
  • Leguizamon, Javier
  • Nechakh, Abderaouf
  • Subaihi, Maad
  • Talib, Noor
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

First Multistage Fracturing of Horizontal Well Drilled in Conventional Tight Carbonate Reservoir in An Onshore Field in the UAE – Challenges and Lessons Learned

  • Aftab, Muhammad Nadeem
  • Dunlop, Tyson
  • Leguizamon, Javier
  • Nechakh, Abderaouf
  • Lazreq, Nabila
  • Subaihi, Maad
  • Talib, Noor
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Successful completion and performance of a horizontal well is one of the most dynamic and complex tasks within the oilfield industry, especially when conventional well is an underperformer.</jats:p><jats:p>Sustaining production from tight reservoirs with conventional stimulation techniques is one of the most challenging tasks. The reservoir of interest is a tight, low permeable carbonate with thin layers. Productivity proven insignificant with considerable in place volume. The objective is to increase and sustain productivity of a pilot well that consists of an open-hole completion.</jats:p><jats:p>Multi-disciplinary data is reviewed in a systematic way to identify reasons of low productivity and to identify possible solutions. After comprehensive studies and risk assessments, it is concluded to re-complete well with cemented Frac string to perform hydraulic fracturing with Plug and Perf (PnP) technique. This technique is applied within a conventional tight reservoir, allowing for the flexibility of stage count, stage spacing, and multi-cluster design in order to maximize the stimulated reservoir volume (SRV) along 2,000 ft. in upper layer, 1,000 ft. across middle layers and 2,000 ft. in lower layer. In addition, company and service provider collaborated to enhance this design through a zero over-flush technique along with diverting agents.</jats:p><jats:p>Core, logging data collected from pilot hole is used to build 1D Mechanical Earth Model (MEM), which is further calibrated with MiniFrac performed with Wireline Formation Tester (WFT).</jats:p><jats:p>A challenge is to avoid Frac height growth towards underlying reservoir, which is separated by dense carbonate layer of 40 ft.</jats:p><jats:p>Extensive modeling is conducted in order to choose correct Frac design along the lateral in which landing depth is variable in different target layers of interest that added complexities to Frac Fluid selection. Finally, two Frac systems are selected for different segments of the lateral. After running a cemented casing, Six (06) Acid fracturing treatment and five (05) Proppant fracturing treatments are successfully executed in the lower and upper layers respectively.</jats:p><jats:p>A comprehensive production test is performed to evaluate and compare the testing results of pre and post frac well. To evaluate the contribution of each stage, a Production Logging Tool (PLT) is deployed. The PLT tool shows the contribution and flow distribution across all the clusters and the efficiency of the Frac design and diversion technique/system.</jats:p><jats:p>This paper summarizes the design processes, selection criteria, challenges, and lessons learned during design and execution phases. It may provide a potential approach for selecting the proper hydraulic fracturing (Acid Vs Prop) and technique (PnP with clusters Vs PnP with one set of perforation). Company has significant portfolio of undeveloped tight carbonate reservoirs with low productivity and considerable volume in place. This technique will pave the way for developing these reservoirs.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • cluster
  • phase
  • ultrasonic-assisted extraction