Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Willingham, Thomas

  • Google
  • 1
  • 4
  • 5

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2018Solids Loading Assessment for Produced Water Reinjection in a Carbonate Reservoir5citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Brown, James
1 / 1 shared
Sowaidi, Alunood Al
1 / 1 shared
Stojkovic, Dragan
1 / 1 shared
Chen, Peng
1 / 8 shared
Chart of publication period
2018

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Brown, James
  • Sowaidi, Alunood Al
  • Stojkovic, Dragan
  • Chen, Peng
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Solids Loading Assessment for Produced Water Reinjection in a Carbonate Reservoir

  • Brown, James
  • Sowaidi, Alunood Al
  • Stojkovic, Dragan
  • Willingham, Thomas
  • Chen, Peng
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>In the oil industry, oil and gas are usually accompanied with water when they are produced from the subsurface. How to tackle water is one of the major concerns for the field development, especially as fields mature and water production increases. Produced water reinjection (PWRI) has been considered an environmentally friendly way to handle large amounts of waste fluid, though it needs to be carefully designed. In this paper we present a lab study conducted to determine the water specification requirements for reinjecting produced water back into the subject carbonate reservoirs.</jats:p><jats:p>The objective of this study is to assess the required produced water quality to maintain matrix injection into the targeted reservoirs. The assessment includes (1) evaluation of the inorganic scaling potential of water sources (fluid compatibility), (2) core flood tests to quantify the impact of various oil content concentrations of produced water on reservoir performance, and (3) a solids loading core flood test to evaluate the injectivity impact of different filtration sizes and different suspended solid concentrations in the produced water. While the previously published paper (Chen et al., 2017) already addresses the scaling and oil content assessments, this paper will present the details of the solids loading core flood test.</jats:p><jats:p>Produced water (PW) collected from the field was utilized in all stages of this study. Analysis of the composition of the suspended solids in the collected produced water revealed a large amount of iron in the PW’s suspended solids, most likely a corrosion product from the long-distance pipeline between the subject field and the current water treatment and separation facilities. Consequently, the collected produced water’s particle size distribution is inadequate to represent the future reinjected produced water which will come from artificial island wells without going through the pipeline. To replicate the anticipated particle size distribution, filtered produced water was mixed with synthetic solid micro particles according to the particle size distribution measured at the well head and the solids loading specification from the skimmer design to mimic the ‘outlet water’ from the skimmer. The skimmer ‘outlet water’ was then filtered to different sizes, starting with 2μm and relaxing the filtration requirements with each step. To replicate oil carryover, 300 ppm of the field’s oil was added to the sequential filtration stages of the skimmer ‘outlet water’ and was flowed through a preserved core plug of the field’s dominant rock type.</jats:p><jats:p>Coreflood results suggest that for particle concentrations which represent the solids loading coming from the designed skimmer (TSS=33mg/L), a surface/external filter cake may form with no significant particle penetration into the rock matrix when filtration size is larger than 2µm. More specifically, particles smaller than 2µm did not contribute to the permeability decline, and most of the permeability decline was caused by a filter cake composed of particles in the 5-10µm range. Particles larger than 10µm do not have a significant effect on the permeability decline, most likely due to their low concentration.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • corrosion
  • permeability
  • iron