Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Bowering, Deborah

  • Google
  • 3
  • 13
  • 5

University of Strathclyde

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2019Developing mechanistic understanding of unconventional growth in pharmaceutical crystals using scanning electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy and time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometrycitations
  • 2016Assessment of Corrosion Rates Under High Shear Conditions - Developments in Laboratory Testing3citations
  • 2014Corrosion Inhibitors Squeeze Treatments-Misconceptions, Concepts and Potential Benefits2citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Florence, Alastair
1 / 11 shared
Halbert, Gavin
1 / 5 shared
Guo, Rui
1 / 7 shared
Polyzois, Hector
1 / 2 shared
Warzecha, Monika
1 / 2 shared
Price, Sarah L.
1 / 2 shared
Thomson, Hunter
1 / 4 shared
Graham, Gordon M.
2 / 9 shared
Ray, John
1 / 2 shared
Simpson, Caroline M.
1 / 3 shared
Frigo, Dario M.
1 / 3 shared
Mackinnon, Kirsty
1 / 1 shared
Mccall, Matthew
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2019
2016
2014

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Florence, Alastair
  • Halbert, Gavin
  • Guo, Rui
  • Polyzois, Hector
  • Warzecha, Monika
  • Price, Sarah L.
  • Thomson, Hunter
  • Graham, Gordon M.
  • Ray, John
  • Simpson, Caroline M.
  • Frigo, Dario M.
  • Mackinnon, Kirsty
  • Mccall, Matthew
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Corrosion Inhibitors Squeeze Treatments-Misconceptions, Concepts and Potential Benefits

  • Bowering, Deborah
  • Graham, Gordon M.
  • Mackinnon, Kirsty
  • Mccall, Matthew
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>While downhole chemical squeeze treatments are common practice for deploying scale inhibitors to protect wellbores and downhole production tubulars from inorganic deposits, their adoption for corrosion inhibitor treatments (CISQ) is much less commonplace. Historically they have often not been considered an option due to either anticipated poor lifetimes or the risk of formation damage in the form of emulsion blocks, wettability changes or relative permeability modification. However, in a number of carbonate reservoirs producing from different regions, corrosion inhibitor squeeze treatments have been shown to provide corrosion protection for downhole production tubulars when no alternative downhole chemical deployment technique is available.</jats:p><jats:p>This paper will present a technical review of the potential benefits of CISQ treatments. Different inhibitor retention/release mechanisms in sandstone and fractured carbonate reservoirs will be discussed, including classic adsorption/desorption and chemical imbibition/diffusion, as will the impact of these mechanisms and oil/water partitioning behaviour on squeeze lifetimes. Another factor limiting adoption of CISQ treatments is the misconception that residual assay techniques may be inadequate, and we demonstrate that this is not necessarily the case.</jats:p><jats:p>In addition to providing a mechanistic interpretation of the available retention and release mechanisms, the results of laboratory core flood studies will illustrate the different retention mechanisms and offer the potential to achieve considerably different lifetimes with different types of corrosion inhibitors. Field examples will also be cited in support of this. In these cases, the accuracy of the measured residual corrosion inhibitor return concentrations were confirmed by conventional electrochemical corrosion inhibitor performance measurements.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • corrosion
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • permeability