Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Dessinges, M.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 4
  • 7

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2008Impact of Yield Stress and Fracture-Face Damage on Production Using a Three-Phase, 2D Model7citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
England, K. W.
1 / 1 shared
Ayoub, J. A.
1 / 4 shared
Friedel, T.
1 / 2 shared
Barati, R.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2008

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • England, K. W.
  • Ayoub, J. A.
  • Friedel, T.
  • Barati, R.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Impact of Yield Stress and Fracture-Face Damage on Production Using a Three-Phase, 2D Model

  • England, K. W.
  • Ayoub, J. A.
  • Dessinges, M.
  • Friedel, T.
  • Barati, R.
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The fracture propagation process using polymer-based fracturing fluids is commonly applied to increase the productivity of producing wells, especially in tight gas formations. During the fracturing operation a layer of concentrated polymer (filter cake) forms on the fracture faces, which limits the loss of fluid to the formation. However, during the production phase, the partially broken filter cake and remaining residues damage the fracture conductivity. The fracture cleanup process is complex and may suffer from the presence of a yield stress, non-Newtonian fluid in place, non-Darcy flow effects in both the fracture and matrix, crushed proppant, embedded proppant and formation spalling as well as both mechanical and hydraulic damage to the matrix near the fracture face. A previously published fast and robust single well model was applied to study the important parameters involved during the fracture cleanup process. This 3-phase, 2-D model is capable of modeling multiple parameters separately. However, the simulator code which was employed did not address the modeling of non-Darcy flow or the rock stress effects on permeability, but focused on the yield stress effects of the fracturing fluid. The simulator proved very useful for assessing the significance of reservoir capillary pressure, fracturing fluid viscosity and yield stress, formation damage, and fracture conductivity on low permeability gas reservoir production with permeabilities from 0.005 to 5 mD. These trends may not carry over to nanodarcy reservoirs, such as the gas shales. The three phases included gas, water and fracturing fluid.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • polymer
  • phase
  • molecular dynamics
  • viscosity
  • permeability