Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Tawfik, Ahmed

  • Google
  • 11
  • 12
  • 23

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (11/11 displayed)

  • 2024Trueness of vat-photopolymerization printing technology of interim fixed partial denture with different building orientation1citations
  • 2023Direct assessment of the shear behavior of strain-hardening cement-based composites under quasi-static and impact loading: Influence of shear span and notch depth11citations
  • 2022On the shear behavior of mineral-bonded composites under impact loadingcitations
  • 2020Challenges in Inspecting Internal Features for SLM Additive Manufactured Build Artifacts1citations
  • 2020The Detection of Unfused Powder in EBM and SLM Additive Manufactured Components4citations
  • 2020Development of an Additive Manufactured Artifact to Characterize Unfused Powder Using Computed Tomography6citations
  • 2019The challenges in edge detection and porosity analysis for dissimilar materials additive manufactured componentscitations
  • 2018Optimization of surface determination strategies to enhance detection of unfused powder in metal additive manufactured componentscitations
  • 2018Development of an AM artefact to characterize unfused powder using computer tomographycitations
  • 2018Characterisation of powder-filled defects in additive manufactured surfaces using X-ray CTcitations
  • 2017Method for characterizing defects/porosity in additive manufactured components using computer tomographycitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Kusumasari, Citra
1 / 2 shared
Mahrous, Aliaa
1 / 1 shared
Blunt, Liam
9 / 23 shared
Radwan, Mohamed
2 / 3 shared
Abdou, Ahmed
1 / 4 shared
Bills, Paul
9 / 14 shared
Signorini, Cesare
1 / 13 shared
Mechtcherine, Viktor
2 / 60 shared
Beerlink, Andre
1 / 2 shared
Racasan, Radu
8 / 11 shared
Bacheva, Desi
2 / 2 shared
Attia, Mazen Ahmed
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2023
2022
2020
2019
2018
2017

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Kusumasari, Citra
  • Mahrous, Aliaa
  • Blunt, Liam
  • Radwan, Mohamed
  • Abdou, Ahmed
  • Bills, Paul
  • Signorini, Cesare
  • Mechtcherine, Viktor
  • Beerlink, Andre
  • Racasan, Radu
  • Bacheva, Desi
  • Attia, Mazen Ahmed
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

The Detection of Unfused Powder in EBM and SLM Additive Manufactured Components

  • Blunt, Liam
  • Radwan, Mohamed
  • Attia, Mazen Ahmed
  • Racasan, Radu
  • Bills, Paul
  • Tawfik, Ahmed
Abstract

<p>Additive manufacturing (AM) is recognized as a core technology for producing high value, complex, and individually designed components as well as prototypes, giving AM a significant advantage over subtractive machining. Selective laser melting (SLM) or electron beam melting (EBM) are two of the main technologies used for producing metal components. The powder size varies, depending on the technology and manufacturer, from 20–50 µm for SLM and 45–100 µm for EBM. One of the current barriers for implementing AM for most industries is the lack of build repeatability and a deficit in quality assurance standards. The mechanical properties of the components depend critically on the density achieved; therefore, defect analysis and detection of unfused powder must be carried out to verify the integrity of the components. Detecting unfused powder in AM parts using X-ray computed tomography (XCT) is challenging because detection relies on variations in density. Unfused particles have the same density as the manufactured parts; therefore, detection is difficult using standard methods for density measurement. This study presents a methodology to detect unfused powders in SLM and EBM-manufactured components. Aluminum and titanium artefacts with designed internal defects filled with unfused powder are scanned with XCT and the results are analyzed with VGSTUDIO Max 3.0 (Volume Graphics, Germany) software package. Preliminary results indicate that detecting unfused powder in an aluminum SLM artifact with a 9.5 µm voxel size is achievable. This is possible because of the size of the voids between the powder particles and the nonuniform shape of the particles. Conversely, detecting unfused powder in the EBM-manufactured titanium artifact is less challenging owing to the uniform spherical shape and slightly larger size of the particles.</p>

Topics
  • density
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • tomography
  • aluminium
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • selective laser melting
  • titanium
  • void
  • electron beam melting