People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Tawfik, Ahmed
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (11/11 displayed)
- 2024Trueness of vat-photopolymerization printing technology of interim fixed partial denture with different building orientationcitations
- 2023Direct assessment of the shear behavior of strain-hardening cement-based composites under quasi-static and impact loading: Influence of shear span and notch depthcitations
- 2022On the shear behavior of mineral-bonded composites under impact loading
- 2020Challenges in Inspecting Internal Features for SLM Additive Manufactured Build Artifactscitations
- 2020The Detection of Unfused Powder in EBM and SLM Additive Manufactured Componentscitations
- 2020Development of an Additive Manufactured Artifact to Characterize Unfused Powder Using Computed Tomographycitations
- 2019The challenges in edge detection and porosity analysis for dissimilar materials additive manufactured components
- 2018Optimization of surface determination strategies to enhance detection of unfused powder in metal additive manufactured components
- 2018Development of an AM artefact to characterize unfused powder using computer tomography
- 2018Characterisation of powder-filled defects in additive manufactured surfaces using X-ray CT
- 2017Method for characterizing defects/porosity in additive manufactured components using computer tomography
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
The Detection of Unfused Powder in EBM and SLM Additive Manufactured Components
Abstract
<p>Additive manufacturing (AM) is recognized as a core technology for producing high value, complex, and individually designed components as well as prototypes, giving AM a significant advantage over subtractive machining. Selective laser melting (SLM) or electron beam melting (EBM) are two of the main technologies used for producing metal components. The powder size varies, depending on the technology and manufacturer, from 20–50 µm for SLM and 45–100 µm for EBM. One of the current barriers for implementing AM for most industries is the lack of build repeatability and a deficit in quality assurance standards. The mechanical properties of the components depend critically on the density achieved; therefore, defect analysis and detection of unfused powder must be carried out to verify the integrity of the components. Detecting unfused powder in AM parts using X-ray computed tomography (XCT) is challenging because detection relies on variations in density. Unfused particles have the same density as the manufactured parts; therefore, detection is difficult using standard methods for density measurement. This study presents a methodology to detect unfused powders in SLM and EBM-manufactured components. Aluminum and titanium artefacts with designed internal defects filled with unfused powder are scanned with XCT and the results are analyzed with VGSTUDIO Max 3.0 (Volume Graphics, Germany) software package. Preliminary results indicate that detecting unfused powder in an aluminum SLM artifact with a 9.5 µm voxel size is achievable. This is possible because of the size of the voids between the powder particles and the nonuniform shape of the particles. Conversely, detecting unfused powder in the EBM-manufactured titanium artifact is less challenging owing to the uniform spherical shape and slightly larger size of the particles.</p>