Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Douglas, John

  • Google
  • 4
  • 12
  • 44

Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (4/4 displayed)

  • 2023A methodology for the risk-based design of bridges in Italycitations
  • 2013Ranking of epistemic uncertainties in scenario-based seismic risk evaluationscitations
  • 2011Modeling the difference in ground-motion magnitude-scaling in small and large earthquakes37citations
  • 2010Comment on "Test of seismic hazard map from 500 years of recorded intensity data in Japan" by Masatoshi Miyazawa and Jim Mori7citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Turchetti, Francesca
1 / 1 shared
Dallasta, Andrea
1 / 6 shared
Zanini, Mariano
1 / 1 shared
Tubaldi, Enrico
1 / 2 shared
Gehl, Pierre
1 / 1 shared
Ducellier, Ariane
1 / 1 shared
Ulrich, Thomas
1 / 2 shared
Rohmer, Jeremy
1 / 2 shared
Negulescu, Caterina
1 / 1 shared
Jousset, Philippe
1 / 3 shared
Bard, Pierre Yves
1 / 1 shared
Beauval, Céline
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2013
2011
2010

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Turchetti, Francesca
  • Dallasta, Andrea
  • Zanini, Mariano
  • Tubaldi, Enrico
  • Gehl, Pierre
  • Ducellier, Ariane
  • Ulrich, Thomas
  • Rohmer, Jeremy
  • Negulescu, Caterina
  • Jousset, Philippe
  • Bard, Pierre Yves
  • Beauval, Céline
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Modeling the difference in ground-motion magnitude-scaling in small and large earthquakes

  • Douglas, John
  • Jousset, Philippe
Abstract

It is often the case that ground-motion records for a given area of interest are available in relative abundance for small (Mw < 5) earthquakes but are practically non-existent for larger earthquakes, which have the potential to cause damage to structures. This is a direct consequence of the almost universally observed Gutenberg-Richter relation that a unit increase in magnitude decreases the number of earthquakes observed by a factor of ten (e.g., Frohlich and Davis 1993, Douglas 2003). The productive use of data from small earthquakes for seismic hazard assessments relies on knowledge of how earthquake ground motions scale with magnitude. The majority of ground-motion prediction equations (GMPEs) are derived, usually by regression analysis, to estimate shaking from earthquakes with Mw ≳ 5 (Douglas 2011), but there is often little consideration given to how they extrapolate to small magnitudes, which are sometimes considered within the hazard integral of probabilistic seismic hazard assessments or for the testing of GMPEs against observations, especially for regions of low-to-moderate seismicity.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy