Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Douglas, John

  • Google
  • 4
  • 12
  • 44

Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (4/4 displayed)

  • 2023A methodology for the risk-based design of bridges in Italycitations
  • 2013Ranking of epistemic uncertainties in scenario-based seismic risk evaluationscitations
  • 2011Modeling the difference in ground-motion magnitude-scaling in small and large earthquakes37citations
  • 2010Comment on "Test of seismic hazard map from 500 years of recorded intensity data in Japan" by Masatoshi Miyazawa and Jim Mori7citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Turchetti, Francesca
1 / 1 shared
Dallasta, Andrea
1 / 6 shared
Zanini, Mariano
1 / 1 shared
Tubaldi, Enrico
1 / 2 shared
Gehl, Pierre
1 / 1 shared
Ducellier, Ariane
1 / 1 shared
Ulrich, Thomas
1 / 2 shared
Rohmer, Jeremy
1 / 2 shared
Negulescu, Caterina
1 / 1 shared
Jousset, Philippe
1 / 3 shared
Bard, Pierre Yves
1 / 1 shared
Beauval, Céline
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2013
2011
2010

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Turchetti, Francesca
  • Dallasta, Andrea
  • Zanini, Mariano
  • Tubaldi, Enrico
  • Gehl, Pierre
  • Ducellier, Ariane
  • Ulrich, Thomas
  • Rohmer, Jeremy
  • Negulescu, Caterina
  • Jousset, Philippe
  • Bard, Pierre Yves
  • Beauval, Céline
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Comment on "Test of seismic hazard map from 500 years of recorded intensity data in Japan" by Masatoshi Miyazawa and Jim Mori

  • Bard, Pierre Yves
  • Douglas, John
  • Beauval, Céline
Abstract

Miyazawa and Mori (2009) propose testing probabilistic seismic hazard assessments (PSHAs) for Japan in terms of predicted macroseismic intensities against those observed over the past 500 yrs. While the comparison presents a real interest to the seismological and engineering communities, their reasoning is based on an incorrect hypothesis and leads to several problems. Comparing probabilistic estimates and observations is an important topic; any available observations should be used to infer constraints on the probabilistic estimates. Testing long-term earthquake hazard predictions is currently one of the biggest challenges in the area of engineering seismology. Several current large-scale seismic hazard projects have work packages dedicated to developing so-called validation techniques (e.g., the European Commission-funded Seismic Hazard Harmonization in Europe [SHARE] project and the Global Earthquake Model). Obviously, this task should be performed with great caution, as such validation studies have a direct impact on, for example, estimates of seismic risk and building regulations.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy