Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Junior, Valter Luiz Jantara

  • Google
  • 2
  • 2
  • 4

University of Birmingham

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2022Quantitative analysis of the structural health of railway turnouts using the acoustic emission technique3citations
  • 2020Damage monitoring of surface treated steel under severe rolling contact loading conditions1citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Dong, Hanshan
1 / 42 shared
Papaelias, Mayorkinos
1 / 5 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Dong, Hanshan
  • Papaelias, Mayorkinos
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Quantitative analysis of the structural health of railway turnouts using the acoustic emission technique

  • Junior, Valter Luiz Jantara
Abstract

<jats:p>Rail defects such as fatigue cracks have been one of the leading root causes of a number of derailments in the past. Cracks that initiate and propagate below the surface are difficult to detect using traditional non-destructive testing (NDT) methods. Acoustic emission (AE) is a moreeffective method for detecting and monitoring crack growth in rails online. This study investigates the applicability of AE for quantifying damage propagation in austenitic cast manganese steel used in manufacturing railway turnouts. The relationship between AE and crack growth rate in austeniticcast manganese steel samples that were fatigue tested in a three-point bending configuration was investigated by evaluating the AE activity with respect to direct current potential drop (DCPD) measurements and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) fractographic analysis of the tested samples.From the results obtained, it was not possible to observe a clear relationship between AE activity and the actual crack growth rate. Based on the SEM fractographic analysis, this is likely due to the plasticity occurring at the tip of the fatigue crack in the tested samples. This is plausiblesince the cast manganese steel samples had been cut off from a plate that had not been previously work hardened. The effect of carbides present in the microstructure is an additional contributing factor. Further tests should be carried out on cast manganese steel samples that have been workhardened prior to fatigue testing.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • microstructure
  • surface
  • scanning electron microscopy
  • crack
  • carbide
  • steel
  • fatigue
  • acoustic emission
  • plasticity
  • Manganese
  • fatigue testing
  • quantitative determination method