Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Walford, B.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 9

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2006Influence of cross-section on the strength of timber beams9citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Zhang, B.
1 / 22 shared
Turner, J.
1 / 4 shared
Harte, A. M.
1 / 2 shared
Bahadori-Jahromi, A.
1 / 1 shared
Kermani, A.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2006

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Zhang, B.
  • Turner, J.
  • Harte, A. M.
  • Bahadori-Jahromi, A.
  • Kermani, A.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Influence of cross-section on the strength of timber beams

  • Zhang, B.
  • Walford, B.
  • Turner, J.
  • Harte, A. M.
  • Bahadori-Jahromi, A.
  • Kermani, A.
Abstract

<p>This paper investigates the strength and deformation characteristics of lightweight timber composite beams manufactured with six different cross-sectional profiles in comparison with readily available laminated veneer lumber (LVL) and glued-laminated (Glulam) beams. All engineered profiles comprised solid timber or LVL flanges and three-ply plywood webs. The number of webs varied from one to four. The beams had an overall depth of 290 mm and were either 88 mm or 106 mm wide. A study was conducted to provide a comparison of the beam designs and to determine possible effects of cross-sectional configuration and connection details on the structural properties of the beams. To enable a realistic analysis, 12 beams were replicated for each design. The individual components of the beams were tested prior to assembly to obtain the modulus of elasticity and shear modulus and were grouped to provide an even distribution of the material properties. The addition of extra webs to the I-beam profile significantly enhanced the bending and shear capacity of the beam while maintaining a high strength to weight ratio. The boxed I-beam proved to be the most efficient to manufacture and displayed superior structural performance compared with the rest of the profiles in terms of flexural stiffness and bending and shear capacity. The experimental results confirmed the significant contribution of the shear deflection to the total deflection of the I-beams, box beams and even solid section beams.</p>

Topics
  • strength
  • composite
  • elasticity