Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Ali, Mohamed Sadakkathulla Mohamed

  • Google
  • 1
  • 3
  • 28

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2019Behaviour and design of air-cured GFRP-reinforced geopolymer concrete square columns28citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Li, Gang
1 / 2 shared
Manalo, Allan
1 / 19 shared
Dong, Minhao
1 / 4 shared
Chart of publication period
2019

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Li, Gang
  • Manalo, Allan
  • Dong, Minhao
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Behaviour and design of air-cured GFRP-reinforced geopolymer concrete square columns

  • Li, Gang
  • Manalo, Allan
  • Ali, Mohamed Sadakkathulla Mohamed
  • Dong, Minhao
Abstract

<p>Conventional steel-reinforced ordinary Portland cement concrete is prone to corrosion. Geopolymer concrete is a new durable cementitious material, and the glass fibre-reinforced polymer (GFRP) is an attractive alternative to steel because of GFRP's compelling physical and mechanical properties, corrosion resistance and electromagnetic transparency. This study investigates the structural properties of 11 air-cured square geopolymer concrete columns reinforced with GFRP bars at various stirrup spacings of 50, 100 and 150 mm. The specimens were tested under varying loading conditions to generate interaction diagrams for comparison with theoretical predictions from existing codes and standards. Effective confinement and higher ductility were achieved by reducing the stirrup spacing. High strains indicating buckling or rupture of the longitudinal GFRP bars and confinement of the core were measured. The comparison between the experimental data and design codes showed that the load-carrying capacity of the columns were favourably under-predicted from a design viewpoint when the compressive GFRP bars were excluded. The strength of the concentrically loaded columns was up to 39·6% higher than the code predictions. The GFRP-reinforced geopolymer concrete columns showed a 10·8% average increment in the load-carrying capacity over their plain concrete sections.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • polymer
  • corrosion
  • glass
  • glass
  • strength
  • steel
  • cement
  • ductility