Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Correia, Ayla Macyelle De Oliveira

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 4

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2016Bonding orthodontic braces in acrylic resin with cyanoacrylate: Does it improve adesion?4citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Rode, Sigmar De Mello
1 / 4 shared
Jóias, Renata Pilli
1 / 3 shared
Repeke, Carlos Eduardo Palanch
1 / 1 shared
Paranhos, Luiz Renato
1 / 1 shared
Mendonça, Adriano Augusto De Melo
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2016

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Rode, Sigmar De Mello
  • Jóias, Renata Pilli
  • Repeke, Carlos Eduardo Palanch
  • Paranhos, Luiz Renato
  • Mendonça, Adriano Augusto De Melo
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Bonding orthodontic braces in acrylic resin with cyanoacrylate: Does it improve adesion?

  • Correia, Ayla Macyelle De Oliveira
  • Rode, Sigmar De Mello
  • Jóias, Renata Pilli
  • Repeke, Carlos Eduardo Palanch
  • Paranhos, Luiz Renato
  • Mendonça, Adriano Augusto De Melo
Abstract

Pacientes em tratamento ortodôntico apresentam restaurações provisórias com frequência. No entanto, poucos estudos avaliam a influência dos adesivos na resistência ao cisalhamento dos bráquetes nessas superfícies. A resina acrílica é comumente indicada para colagem de bráquetes, porém o uso do cianoacrilato como adesivo ortodôntico é uma opção analisada. O objetivo do presente trabalho foi avaliar o desempenho do cianoacrilato associado aos materiais comumente utilizados para a fixação de bráquetes metálicos em restaurações provisórias de resina acrílica. Quarenta amostras em resina acrílica foram preparadas e as superfícies homogeinizadas com lixas de carboneto de silício (320 e 600). Em seguida, as amostras foram divididas aleatoriamente em quatro grupos (n=10) com base no tratamento de superfície e agente de união: G1 - bráquetes colados com resina acrílica; G2 - bráquetes colados com resina acrílica e aplicação de cianoacrilato; G3 - bráquetes colados com Transbond(tm) XT; G4 - bráquetes colados com Transbond(tm) XT e aplicação de cianoacrilato. Foram utilizados bráquetes ortodônticos de aço inoxidável, prescrição Roth, Kirium (3M/Abzil) para incisivos centrais superiores direitos, slot 022. Após colagem, as amostras foram submetidas ao teste de cisalhamento a uma velocidade de 0,5mm/min em uma máquina de ensaios universal (EMIC DL-1000). Os dados foram coletados e submetidos à análise estatística pelo teste ANOVA com nível de significância de 5%. A associação de resina acrílica ao cianoacrilato (G2) resultou na maior resistência ao cisalhamento (13,76 MPa), mas não significativa em comparação aos valores obtidos para a resina acrílica (G1= 7,76 MPa). O mesmo pôde ser observado para a associação Transbond(tm) XT e cianoacrilato (G4= 4,03 MPa) em relação a utilização da Transbond(tm) XT de forma isolada (G3= 3,87 MPa) e resina acrílica. O tratamento de superfície tem efeito significativo na resistência da união dos bráquetes colados aos materiais provisórios. A associação de cianoacrilato ao monômero de metilmetacrilato apresentou maior resistência ao cisalhamento, sendo mais indicada clinicamente. Patients in orthodontic treatments frequently present composite restorations. However, few studies evaluated the influence of bonding materials within braces shearing bond strength on composite surfaces. The acrylic resin became the recommended material for bonding brackets on these surfaces; however the use of cyanoacrylate emerged as a potential option. The present study aimed to evaluate the performance of cyanoacrylate associated with orthodontic materials commonly used for the fixation of metallic braces on temporary restorations of acrylic resin. Forty samples were prepared with acrylic resin and homogenized with silicon carbide sand paper (320 and 600). The samples were randomly divided in four groups (n=10) based on the material treatment and bonding agent: G1 - braces bonded with acrylic resin; G2 - braces bonded with acrylic resin combined with application of cyanoacrylate; G3 - braces bonded with Transbond(tm) XT; G4 - braces bonded with Transbond(tm) XT combined with application of cyanoacrylate. Only stainless steel braces were used, prescription Roth, Kirium (3M/Abzil) designed for maxillary right central incisors, slot 022. After bonding, the sample underwent shearing tests at 0.5mm/min within a standard testing device (EMIC DL-1000). Statistical data consisted of ANOVA with significance level set at 5%. Group 2 (G2) reached major shearing strength (13.76 MPa). However, it was not statistically significant in face of the outcomes of Group 1 (G1) (G1= 7.76 MPa). The same was observed for the association of Transbond(tm) XT and cyanoacrylate (G4= 4.03MPa) compared with isolated Transbond(tm) XT (G3= 3.87 MPa) and acrylic resin. Surface treatment of orthodontic material revealed a significant effect on shearing strength of temporary materials. The association between cyanoacrylate with monomer of methyl methacrylate presented major shearing strength, becoming more indicated for clinical interventions.

Topics
  • surface
  • stainless steel
  • strength
  • carbide
  • composite
  • transmission electron microscopy
  • Silicon
  • resin
  • level set