Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Luong, Van Hai

  • Google
  • 1
  • 3
  • 3

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2022Machine learning for predicting mechanical behavior of concrete beams with 3D printed TPMS3citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Nguyen-Xuan, H.
1 / 5 shared
Nguyen, Lieu B.
1 / 2 shared
Tran-Quoc, Kim
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Nguyen-Xuan, H.
  • Nguyen, Lieu B.
  • Tran-Quoc, Kim
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Machine learning for predicting mechanical behavior of concrete beams with 3D printed TPMS

  • Nguyen-Xuan, H.
  • Luong, Van Hai
  • Nguyen, Lieu B.
  • Tran-Quoc, Kim
Abstract

<jats:p>Bioinspired structures are remarkable porous structures with great strength-to-weight ratios. Hence, they have been applied in various fields including biomedical, transportation, and aerospace materials, etc. Recent studies have shown the significant impact of the plastic 3D printed triply periodic minimal surfaces (TPMS) structure on the cement beam including increasing the peak load, reducing the deflection, and improving the ductility. In this study, a machine learning (ML) surrogate model has been conducted to predict the beam behavior under static bending load. At first, various combinations of plastic volume fractions and numbers of core layers have been adopted to reinforce the constituent beam. The finite element method (FEM) was implemented to investigate the influences of these reinforcement strategies. Next, the above data were employed to create the ML model. A three-process assessment was proposed to achieve the most suitable model for the present problem, these processes were the model hyperparameter tuning, the performance assessment, and the handling overfitting with deep learning (DL) techniques. Consequently, both beam peak loads and maximum deflections were proportional to the volume fraction. The increment in TPMS layers could lead to the enhancement in both traits but with a nonlinear relationship. Furthermore, each trait may be a ceiling value that could not be exceeded with a specific volume fraction despite any number of layers. This conclusion was indicated by the surrogate model predictions. The final model in this study could deal with noisy data from FEM and with the support of a new early stopping condition, excellent performance could be found on both train and test data. The maximum deviations of 2.5% and 3.5% for peak loads and maximum midpoint displacements, respectively, have verified the robustness of the present surrogate model.&#x0D;  &#x0D;  </jats:p>

Topics
  • porous
  • surface
  • polymer
  • strength
  • cement
  • ductility
  • machine learning