People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Kowalewski, Zbigniew L.
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (5/5 displayed)
- 2023Microstructural evolution of 6061 aluminium alloy subjected to static and dynamic compression at low temperaturecitations
- 2023Thermal Barrier Coatings for High-Temperature Performance of Nickel-Based Superalloys: A Synthetic Reviewcitations
- 2019Influences of horizontal and vertical build orientations and post-fabrication processes on the fatigue behavior of stainless steel 316l produced by selective laser meltingcitations
- 2012AlMg/SiC Metal Matrix Composite under Fatigue and Creep Conditions
- 2012Damage analysis of Al(Mg)/SiC composites under fatigue conditions
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Microstructural evolution of 6061 aluminium alloy subjected to static and dynamic compression at low temperature
Abstract
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>In this research, an effect of low temperature on the mechanical properties and microstructure of 6061-T6 aluminium alloy (AA6061-T6) subjected to static and dynamic loading was investigated systematically. The specimens were subjected to compression at the temperature of − 80°C in a range of strain rates from 0.001 to 0.1 1/s under static conditions, and from 1250 to 3400 1/s under dynamic conditions to compare their mechanical responses. The deformation mechanisms were discussed based on EBSD analysis. It was found, that under both testing conditions, dynamic recovery was the dominant mechanism responsible for material deformation.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Graphical abstract</jats:bold></jats:p>