Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Küster, Sascha

  • Google
  • 1
  • 2
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2023Local fatigue assessment of butt-welded joints between additively manufactured 316L stainless steel partscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Schubnell, Jan
1 / 13 shared
Braun, Moritz
1 / 20 shared
Chart of publication period
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Schubnell, Jan
  • Braun, Moritz
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Local fatigue assessment of butt-welded joints between additively manufactured 316L stainless steel parts

  • Schubnell, Jan
  • Küster, Sascha
  • Braun, Moritz
Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) has seen a rapid increase in application for many applications in recent years; nevertheless, there are still technical limitation with respect to widespread industrial applications. One important aspect is the relative limited building volume of the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process. Thus, the joining of AM parts makes it possible to increase the volume of AM structures; however, it is currently unclear whether welded AM parts can be assessed using fatigue assessment concepts typically applied for welded components. In particular, local fatigue assessment concepts seem to be suitable for this task, as they are capable to assess complex part and weld geometries. In this study, local concepts based on the micro-structural support effect hypothesis are applied as they also account for support effects at weld transitions. The considered methods are the critical distance and the IBESS approach. To investigate their applicability, fatigue tests were performed on butt-welded joints of 316L AM steel plates made by gas metal arc welding. To account, for the different weld seam position relative to the LBPF building process, joints were produced with weld seams parallel and vertical to the layer orientation of AM plates. For all three test series, the local fatigue assessment concepts lead to conservative results; however, the comparison between numerical and test results also reveal some shortcomings of the chosen concepts.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • stainless steel
  • fatigue
  • selective laser melting
  • joining