Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Farooq, Danish

  • Google
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2023Prediction of the rubberized concrete behavior: A comparison of gene expression programming and response surface methodcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Javed, Muhammad Faisal
1 / 14 shared
Tufail, Rana Faisal
1 / 1 shared
Ahmad, Jawad
1 / 16 shared
Deifalla, Ahmed Farouk
1 / 9 shared
Maqsoom, Ahsen
1 / 1 shared
Ashraf, Hassan
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Javed, Muhammad Faisal
  • Tufail, Rana Faisal
  • Ahmad, Jawad
  • Deifalla, Ahmed Farouk
  • Maqsoom, Ahsen
  • Ashraf, Hassan
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Prediction of the rubberized concrete behavior: A comparison of gene expression programming and response surface method

  • Javed, Muhammad Faisal
  • Tufail, Rana Faisal
  • Farooq, Danish
  • Ahmad, Jawad
  • Deifalla, Ahmed Farouk
  • Maqsoom, Ahsen
  • Ashraf, Hassan
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The use of rubber in concrete to partially substitute mineral aggregates is an effort to decrease the global amount of scrap tires. This study investigates the behavior of rubberized concrete (RC) with various replacement ratios (0–50%) by volume and replacement type (fine, coarse, and fine-coarse) using soft computing techniques. The uniaxial compressive strength (CS), elastic modulus (EM), and ductility (D) are measured, and the effect of rubber content and the rubber aggregate type on the properties of RC is investigated. Scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction analyses are made to determine its microstructural and chemical composition. This article compares the efficiency of two RC models using a recently developed artificial intelligence technique, i.e., gene expression programming (GEP) and conventional technique, i.e., response surface method (RSM). Statistical models are developed to predict the CS, TS, EM, and D. The mathematical models are validated using determination coefficient (<jats:italic>R</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup>) and adjusted coefficient (<jats:italic>R</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup>adj), and they are found to be significant. Furthermore, both methods (i.e., RSM and GEP) are very well correlated with the experimental data. The GEP is found to be more effective at predicting the experimental test results for RC. The projected methods can be executed for any practical value of RC.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • mineral
  • surface
  • scanning electron microscopy
  • x-ray diffraction
  • strength
  • chemical composition
  • ductility
  • rubber