Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Eisma, R.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 2

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2012Response of Thiel-embalmed Human Liver and Kidney to MR-guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery2citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Saliev, T.
1 / 1 shared
Melzer, Andreas
1 / 1 shared
Karakitsios, I.
1 / 1 shared
Ahmad, S.
1 / 22 shared
Donald-Simpson, Helen
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2012

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Saliev, T.
  • Melzer, Andreas
  • Karakitsios, I.
  • Ahmad, S.
  • Donald-Simpson, Helen
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Response of Thiel-embalmed Human Liver and Kidney to MR-guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery

  • Saliev, T.
  • Melzer, Andreas
  • Karakitsios, I.
  • Ahmad, S.
  • Donald-Simpson, Helen
  • Eisma, R.
Abstract

Introduction<br/>Thielembalmingtechniqueprovidesanidealmedium forconservationofcadaversandorgansforfurther experimentationandtestingdevicesfornon-invasivesurgery,includingMR-guidedFocusedUltrasound (MRgFUS). The rational of this studywas to scrutinize the response of Thiel-embalmed tissue of explanted human liver and kidney on different acoustic energies.<br/><br/>Methods<br/>ThesonicationwasperformedbyMRgFUS(ExAblate,InSightec).Afterpre-planningMR-imagingand defining regions of treatment, the tissue was ablated by ultrasound with frequency of 1.15 MHz. Three spots on the liver were sonicated with acoustic energies of 253 J, 506 J and 709 J respectively (time 20 sec). The kidney was sonicated on three different locations. First spot was treated with energy of 777 J (40 sec), second spot with 863 J (40 sec). The last spot on kidney was treated 3 times consistently with acoustic energy of 777 J (120 sec). <br/><br/>Results<br/>The obtained data demonstrated that sonication of the liver at ‘low’ regimeinduced the rise of temperature up to59C,whilethe‘medium’and‘high’regimeselicitedsignificantlyhigherriseupto109Cand120C respectively. The prolonged treatment of the same spot of the liver did not lead to increase of temperature due to inductionofcavitation(‘screeningeffect’).Thesameeffectwasobservedforthekidney,wheredespiteof continuous sonication of the same spot, the maximal temperature did not exceed 75 C. The highest temperature rise for kidney was 87 C (at 863 J). <br/><br/>Conclusion<br/>The acquired data indicate that Thiel embalmed organs constitute a suitable model for testing and optimization of MRgFUS.

Topics
  • size-exclusion chromatography