| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Kestens, Leo A. I.
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (14/14 displayed)
- 2024Comparative analysis of crystal plasticity models in predicting deformation texture in IF-Steelcitations
- 2023Evaluation of 3D-Printed Magnetic Materials For Additively-Manufactured Electrical Machinescitations
- 2023Process optimization and characterization of dense pure copper parts produced by paste-based 3D micro-extrusioncitations
- 2023Material Engineering of 3D-Printed Silicon Steel Alloys for the Next Generation of Electrical Machines and Sustainable Electromobilitycitations
- 2022Analysis of ESAFORM 2021 cup drawing benchmark of an Al alloy, critical factors for accuracy and efficiency of FE simulationscitations
- 2022Analysis of ESAFORM 2021 cup drawing benchmark of an Al alloy, critical factors for accuracy and efficiency of FE simulationscitations
- 2022Analysis of ESAFORM 2021 cup drawing benchmark of an Al alloy, critical factors for accuracy and efficiency of FE simulations.citations
- 2022The Role of Parent Phase Topology in Double Young–Kurdjumow–Sachs Variant Selection during Phase Transformation in Low-Carbon Steelscitations
- 2021Microstructure, Anisotropy and Formability Evolution of an Annealed AISI 430 Stainless Steel Sheetcitations
- 2017Use of local electrochemical methods (SECM, EC-STM) and AFM to differentiate microstructural effects (EBSD) on very pure coppercitations
- 2016The effect of heating rate on the recrystallization behavior in cold rolled ultra low carbon steelcitations
- 2015Shear banding and its contribution to texture evolution in rotated Goss orientations of BCC structured materialscitations
- 2012Texture evolution during asymmetrical warm rolling and subsequent annealing of electrical steelcitations
- 2012Texture Control in Steel and Aluminium Alloys by Rolling and Recrystallization in Non-Conventional Sheet Manufacturingcitations
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
article
Use of local electrochemical methods (SECM, EC-STM) and AFM to differentiate microstructural effects (EBSD) on very pure copper
Abstract
When aiming for an increased and more sustainable use of metals a thorough knowledge of the corrosion phenomenon as function of the local metal microstructure is of crucial importance. In this work, we summarize the information presented in our previous publications[1-3] and present an overview of the different local (electrochemical) techniques that have been proven to be effective in studying the relation between different microstructural variables and their different electrochemical behavior. Atomic force microscopy (AFM)[1], scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM)[2], and electrochemical scanning tunneling microscopy (EC-STM)[3] were used in combination with electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD). Consequently, correlations could be identified between the grain orientation and grain boundary characteristics, on the one hand, and the electrochemical behavior on the other hand. The grain orientation itself has an influence on the corrosion, and the orientation of the neighboring grains also seems to play a decisive role in the dissolution rate. With respect to intergranular corrosion, only coherent twin boundaries seem to be resistant.