People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Jiroušek, Ondřej
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (7/7 displayed)
- 2022Strain Rate-Dependent Compressive Properties of Bulk Cylindrical 3D-Printed Samples from 316L Stainless Steelcitations
- 2021Hybrid Auxetic Structures: Structural Optimization and Mechanical Characterization
- 2020Dynamic Deformation Behaviour of Chiral Auxetic Lattices at Low and High Strain-Ratescitations
- 2019Strain Dependency of Poisson's Ratio of SLS Printed Auxetic Lattices Subjected to Quasi‐Static and Dynamic Compressive Loadingcitations
- 2019COMPRESSIVE PROPERTIES OF AUXETIC STRUCTURES WITH CONTROLLED STIFFNESS OF STRUT JOINTScitations
- 2018Testing of Auxetic Materials Using Hopkinson Bar and Digital Image Correlationcitations
- 2016SEMI–AUTOMATED ASSESSMENT OF MICROMECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE METAL FOAMS ON THE CELL-WALL LEVELcitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
COMPRESSIVE PROPERTIES OF AUXETIC STRUCTURES WITH CONTROLLED STIFFNESS OF STRUT JOINTS
Abstract
<jats:p>Presented paper deals with experimental study on compressive properties of auxetics with controlled stiffness of strut joints. The variable strut joints properties were simulated by adding extra amount of material in the struts’ intersection regions. Four groups of inverted honeycomb structures were prepared by multi-jet 3D printing and tested in quasi-static compression. The structure collapsed gradually, however after the first collapse, failure in entire cross-section occurred due to the brittle nature of the base material. The behavior up to the first collapse was consistent among the specimens within each group, while differed slightly subsequently. With higher reinforcement in the joints, results showed increasing stress at the first collapse (ultimate compressive stress) while the strain at the first collapse remained unchanged. The auxetic behaviour became less significant with increasing joints’ reinforcement.</jats:p>