Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Deeks, Jonathan

  • Google
  • 4
  • 67
  • 2561

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (4/4 displayed)

  • 2024Symptom-triggered testing improves the detection of early-stage and low-volume resectable advanced-stage high grade serous ovarian cancer5citations
  • 2018Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies2366citations
  • 2018Dermoscopy, with and without visual inspection, for diagnosing melanoma in adults183citations
  • 2016Testing and treating women after unsuccessful conservative treatments for overactive bladder or mixed urinary incontinence: a model-based economic evaluation based on the BUS study7citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Ottridge, Ryan
1 / 1 shared
Sturdy, Lauren
1 / 1 shared
Rosenfeld, Nitzan
1 / 1 shared
Bourne, Tom
1 / 2 shared
Stobart, Hilary
1 / 3 shared
Timmerman, Dirk
1 / 1 shared
Kristunas, Caroline
1 / 1 shared
Agarwal, Ridhi
1 / 1 shared
Kwong, Fong Lien Audrey
1 / 1 shared
Davenport, Clare
2 / 2 shared
Brenton, James
1 / 1 shared
Gentrymaharaj, Alex
1 / 1 shared
Kehoe, Sean
1 / 1 shared
Sundar, Sudha
1 / 1 shared
Menon, Usha
1 / 1 shared
Neal, Richard
1 / 1 shared
Mallett, Sue
1 / 1 shared
Takwoingi, Yemisi
2 / 3 shared
Dinnes, Jacqueline
1 / 1 shared
Matin, Rubeta N.
1 / 1 shared
Wong, Kai Yuen
1 / 1 shared
Thomson, David R.
1 / 1 shared
Group, Cochrane Skin Cancer Diagnostic Test Accuracy
1 / 1 shared
Chuchu, Naomi
1 / 1 shared
Bayliss, Susan
1 / 1 shared
Grainge, Matthew J.
1 / 1 shared
Fawzy, Monica
1 / 1 shared
Walter, Fiona M.
1 / 2 shared
Godfrey, Kathie
1 / 1 shared
Ruffano, Lavinia Ferrante Di
1 / 1 shared
Abbott, Rachel
1 / 1 shared
Aldridge, Roger Benjamin
1 / 1 shared
Williams, Hywel C.
1 / 1 shared
Verghese, Tina
1 / 1 shared
Coomarasamy, Arri
1 / 1 shared
Rachaneni, Suneetha
1 / 1 shared
Mccooty, Shanteela
1 / 1 shared
Latthe, Pallavi
1 / 1 shared
Roberts, Tracy
1 / 1 shared
Daniels, Jane
1 / 2 shared
Barton, Pelham
1 / 1 shared
Goranitis, Ilias
1 / 1 shared
Middleton, Lee
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2018
2016

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Ottridge, Ryan
  • Sturdy, Lauren
  • Rosenfeld, Nitzan
  • Bourne, Tom
  • Stobart, Hilary
  • Timmerman, Dirk
  • Kristunas, Caroline
  • Agarwal, Ridhi
  • Kwong, Fong Lien Audrey
  • Davenport, Clare
  • Brenton, James
  • Gentrymaharaj, Alex
  • Kehoe, Sean
  • Sundar, Sudha
  • Menon, Usha
  • Neal, Richard
  • Mallett, Sue
  • Takwoingi, Yemisi
  • Dinnes, Jacqueline
  • Matin, Rubeta N.
  • Wong, Kai Yuen
  • Thomson, David R.
  • Group, Cochrane Skin Cancer Diagnostic Test Accuracy
  • Chuchu, Naomi
  • Bayliss, Susan
  • Grainge, Matthew J.
  • Fawzy, Monica
  • Walter, Fiona M.
  • Godfrey, Kathie
  • Ruffano, Lavinia Ferrante Di
  • Abbott, Rachel
  • Aldridge, Roger Benjamin
  • Williams, Hywel C.
  • Verghese, Tina
  • Coomarasamy, Arri
  • Rachaneni, Suneetha
  • Mccooty, Shanteela
  • Latthe, Pallavi
  • Roberts, Tracy
  • Daniels, Jane
  • Barton, Pelham
  • Goranitis, Ilias
  • Middleton, Lee
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Testing and treating women after unsuccessful conservative treatments for overactive bladder or mixed urinary incontinence: a model-based economic evaluation based on the BUS study

  • Deeks, Jonathan
  • Verghese, Tina
  • Coomarasamy, Arri
  • Rachaneni, Suneetha
  • Mccooty, Shanteela
  • Latthe, Pallavi
  • Roberts, Tracy
  • Daniels, Jane
  • Barton, Pelham
  • Goranitis, Ilias
  • Middleton, Lee
Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare the cost-effectiveness of bladder ultrasonography, clinical history, and urodynamic testing in guiding treatment decisions in a secondary care setting for women failing first line conservative treatment for overactive bladder or urgency-predominant mixed urinary incontinence.<br/><br/>DesignModel-based economic evaluation from a UK National Health Service (NHS) perspective using data from the Bladder Ultrasound Study (BUS) and secondary sources.<br/><br/>MethodsCost-effectiveness analysis using a decision tree and a 5-year time horizon based on the outcomes of cost per woman successfully treated and cost per Quality-Adjusted Life-Year (QALY). Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, and a value of information analysis are also undertaken.<br/><br/>ResultsBladder ultrasonography is more costly and less effective test-treat strategy than clinical history and urodynamics. Treatment on the basis of clinical history alone has an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £491,100 per woman successfully treated and an ICER of £60,200 per QALY compared with the treatment of all women on the basis of urodynamics. Restricting the use of urodynamics to women with a clinical history of mixed urinary incontinence only is the optimal test-treat strategy on cost-effectiveness grounds with ICERs of £19,500 per woman successfully treated and £12,700 per QALY compared with the treatment of all women based upon urodynamics. Conclusions remained robust to sensitivity analyses, but subject to large uncertainties.<br/><br/>ConclusionsTreatment based upon urodynamics can be seen as a cost-effective strategy, and particularly when targeted at women with clinical history of mixed urinary incontinence only. Further research is needed to resolve current decision uncertainty.<br/>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • laser emission spectroscopy