People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Poulis, Hans
Delft University of Technology
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (9/9 displayed)
- 2022The influence of the surface roughness, creep and relaxation on the performance of elastomeric liners for sustainable glass bottle closurescitations
- 2021The influence of grit blasting and UV/Ozone treatments on Ti-Ti adhesive bonds and their durability after sol-gel and primer applicationcitations
- 2021The photostability and peel strength of ethylene butyl acrylate copolymer blends for use in conservation of cultural heritagecitations
- 2020Influence of moisture and CO2 on the material behavior of thermoplastic elastomers for beer bottle closurescitations
- 2020Enhanced Interface Adhesion by Novel Eco-Epoxy Adhesives Based on the Modified Tannic Acid on Al and CFRP Adherendscitations
- 2020The Influence of Loading, Temperature and Relative Humidity on Adhesives for Canvas Liningcitations
- 2020Improving the adhesion strength of polymers: effect of surface treatmentscitations
- 2017Laboratory strength testing of pine wood and birch bark adhesives: a first study of the material properties of pitchcitations
- 2016Lap Shear and Impact Testing of Ochre and Beeswax in Experimental Middle Stone Age Compound Adhesivescitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Lap Shear and Impact Testing of Ochre and Beeswax in Experimental Middle Stone Age Compound Adhesives
Abstract
The production of compound adhesives using disparate ingredients is seen as some of the best evidence of advanced cognition outside of the use of symbolism. Previous field and laboratory testing of adhesives has shown the complexities involved in creating an effective Middle Stone Age glue using Acacia gum. However, it is currently unclear how efficient different adhesive recipes are, how much specific ingredients influence their performance, and how difficult it may have been for those ingredients to be combined to maximum effect. We conducted a series of laboratory-based lap shear and impact tests, following modern adhesion testing standards, to determine the efficacy of compound adhesives, with particular regard to the ingredient ratios. We tested rosin (colophony) and gum adhesives, containing additives of beeswax and ochre in varying ratios. During both lap shear and impact tests compound rosin adhesives performed better than single component rosin adhesives, and pure acacia gum was the strongest. The large difference in performance between each base adhesive and the significant changes in performance that occur due to relatively small changes in ingredient ratios lend further support to the notion that high levels of skill and knowledge were required to consistently produce the most effective adhesives.