693.932 PEOPLE
| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Wang, Fengwen
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (18/18 displayed)
- 2021On the competition for ultimately stiff and strong architected materialscitations
- 2018Benchmarking state-of-the-art numerical simulation techniques for analyzing large photonic crystal membrane line defect cavities
- 2018Benchmarking state-of-the-art numerical simulation techniques for analyzing large photonic crystal membrane line defect cavities
- 2018Benchmarking state-of-the-art optical simulation methods for analyzing large nanophotonic structures
- 2018Benchmarking state-of-the-art optical simulation methods for analyzing large nanophotonic structures
- 2018Benchmarking five numerical simulation techniques for computing resonance wavelengths and quality factors in photonic crystal membrane line defect cavitiescitations
- 2018Which Computational Methods Are Good for Analyzing Large Photonic Crystal Membrane Cavities?
- 2018Which Computational Methods Are Good for Analyzing Large Photonic Crystal Membrane Cavities?
- 2018Investment casting and experimental testing of heat sinks designed by topology optimizationcitations
- 2018Benchmarking five numerical simulation techniques for computing resonance wavelengths and quality factors in photonic crystal membrane line defect cavitiescitations
- 2017Comparison of Five Computational Methods for Computing Q Factors in Photonic Crystal Membrane Cavities
- 2017Comparison of Five Computational Methods for Computing Q Factors in Photonic Crystal Membrane Cavities
- 2017Benchmarking five computational methods for analyzing large photonic crystal membrane cavitiescitations
- 2017Benchmarking five computational methods for analyzing large photonic crystal membrane cavitiescitations
- 2015Topology Optimized Architectures with Programmable Poisson's Ratio over Large Deformationscitations
- 2014Design of materials with prescribed nonlinear propertiescitations
- 2011Modelling of Active Semiconductor Photonic Crystal Waveguides and Robust Designs based on Topology Optimization
- 2011Modelling of Active Semiconductor Photonic Crystal Waveguides and Robust Designs based on Topology Optimization
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
article
Benchmarking five numerical simulation techniques for computing resonance wavelengths and quality factors in photonic crystal membrane line defect cavities
Abstract
We present numerical studies of two photonic crystal membrane microcavities,a short line-defect cavity with relatively low quality (Q) factor and a longercavity with high Q. We use five state-of-the-art numerical simulationtechniques to compute the cavity Q factor and the resonance wavelength for the fundamental cavity mode in both structures. For each method,the relevant computational parameters are systematically varied to estimate thecomputational uncertainty. We show that some methods are more suitable thanothers for treating these challenging geometries.